Diagnostic Value of NLR and PLR for Malignancy in Ovarian Tumor: Feasible Markers in Low-resource Setting

Aim and background: Most ovarian cancer patients are diagnosed at a late stage, which correlates with a poorer prognosis.Systemic inflammation plays an important role in tumor initiation and progression.Therefore, systemic inflammation markers, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), are extensively studied.However, the applicability of PLR and NLR as malignancy predictors and the diagnostic accuracy in ovarian malignancy need to be clarified.The study aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of PLR and NLR for malignant ovarian tumors.Methods: We included 161 patients who underwent surgery on an indicated ovarian tumor.Histopathologic confirmation of malignancy was used as a gold standard.Preoperative PLR and NLR values were compared to pathologic confirmation of malignancy.A threshold of NLR 3.0 was defined as high NLR, while PLR value 160 was considered high.The area under the curve (AUC) value of the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to distinguish between benign and malignant individuals.Area under the curve above 0.7 is considered an acceptable diagnostic performance.Results: We found that both preoperative PLR and NLR had significantly greater values in ovarian cancer than in benign ovarian tumors (p < 0.001).High NLR patients showed greater possibility of malignancy (OR = 5.32; 95% CI: 2.52-11.21;p < 0.001).Patients with high PLR also showed comparable odds ratio for malignancy (OR = 4.03; 95% CI:1.95-8.31;p < 0.001).The sensitivity of NLR was 66.3% and specificity was 72.9%, while PLR sensitivity and specificity were 78.76 and 52.08%, respectively.The accuracy of NLR was 68.32% (AUC = 0.743) and PLR was 60.54% (AUC = 0.733).Conclusion: Both PLR and NLR have valuable accuracy in differentiating ovarian malignancies from benign ovarian tumors.These results may be important evidence to support the applicability of these cheap markers to indicate ovarian malignancy in low-resource settings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10006-2545
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Value of NLR and PLR for Malignancy in Ovarian Tumor: Feasible Markers in Low-resource Setting

Andi Kurniadi, Muhammad Ary Zucha, Ardhanu Kusumanto, Ali Budi Harsono et al.
Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
article

Diagnostic Value of NLR and PLR for Malignancy in Ovarian Tumor: Feasible Markers in Low-resource Setting

Andi Kurniadi, Muhammad Ary Zucha, Ardhanu Kusumanto, Ali Budi Harsono, Siti Salima
article en

Abstract

Aim and background: Most ovarian cancer patients are diagnosed at a late stage, which correlates with a poorer prognosis.Systemic inflammation plays an important role in tumor initiation and progression.Therefore, systemic inflammation markers, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), are extensively studied.However, the applicability of PLR and NLR as malignancy predictors and the diagnostic accuracy in ovarian malignancy need to be clarified.The study aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of PLR and NLR for malignant ovarian tumors.Methods: We included 161 patients who underwent surgery on an indicated ovarian tumor.Histopathologic confirmation of malignancy was used as a gold standard.Preoperative PLR and NLR values were compared to pathologic confirmation of malignancy.A threshold of NLR 3.0 was defined as high NLR, while PLR value 160 was considered high.The area under the curve (AUC) value of the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to distinguish between benign and malignant individuals.Area under the curve above 0.7 is considered an acceptable diagnostic performance.Results: We found that both preoperative PLR and NLR had significantly greater values in ovarian cancer than in benign ovarian tumors (p < 0.001).High NLR patients showed greater possibility of malignancy (OR = 5.32; 95% CI: 2.52-11.21;p < 0.001).Patients with high PLR also showed comparable odds ratio for malignancy (OR = 4.03; 95% CI:1.95-8.31;p < 0.001).The sensitivity of NLR was 66.3% and specificity was 72.9%, while PLR sensitivity and specificity were 78.76 and 52.08%, respectively.The accuracy of NLR was 68.32% (AUC = 0.743) and PLR was 60.54% (AUC = 0.733).Conclusion: Both PLR and NLR have valuable accuracy in differentiating ovarian malignancies from benign ovarian tumors.These results may be important evidence to support the applicability of these cheap markers to indicate ovarian malignancy in low-resource settings.

Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and GynaecologyVol. 16(S3)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.