Dialectic urban terms: a critical study of the concepts sustainable, complete, liveable and humanized streets

This research seeks to demystify the ambiguity surrounding key terms in urban design. These terms include sustainable, complete, livable, and humane streets. These concepts are key to improving citizens' satisfaction with their cities. They can also boost participation in urban development discussions. However, the literature and studies misuse these terms. This causes confusion about their meanings. This study reviews relevant literature and research. It seeks to see if these terms reflect distinct ideas within a common framework. We will check these terms based on their criteria and uses. The results show that these concepts are similar. They all aim to preserve the environment, improve transport, and boost city interactions. Nevertheless, each term has its advantages. Livable streets focus on comfort and well-being. Sustainable streets focus on the environment and protecting natural resources. Complete streets value diversity and many transport options. Humane streets aim to boost social cooperation and community prosperit

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wasit Journal of Engineering Sciences
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31185/wjes.vol13.iss1.635
Primary Topic
Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dialectic urban terms: a critical study of the concepts sustainable, complete, liveable and humanized streets

M. Hassan Awad, Yaqeen Haider, Ihsan Abbas
Wasit Journal of Engineering Sciences
Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
article

Dialectic urban terms: a critical study of the concepts sustainable, complete, liveable and humanized streets

M. Hassan Awad, Yaqeen Haider, Ihsan Abbas
article en

Abstract

This research seeks to demystify the ambiguity surrounding key terms in urban design. These terms include sustainable, complete, livable, and humane streets. These concepts are key to improving citizens' satisfaction with their cities. They can also boost participation in urban development discussions. However, the literature and studies misuse these terms. This causes confusion about their meanings. This study reviews relevant literature and research. It seeks to see if these terms reflect distinct ideas within a common framework. We will check these terms based on their criteria and uses. The results show that these concepts are similar. They all aim to preserve the environment, improve transport, and boost city interactions. Nevertheless, each term has its advantages. Livable streets focus on comfort and well-being. Sustainable streets focus on the environment and protecting natural resources. Complete streets value diversity and many transport options. Humane streets aim to boost social cooperation and community prosperit

Wasit Journal of Engineering SciencesVol. 13(1)
University of Wasit (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.