Can ΔSCF and ROKS DFT-Based Methods Predict the Inversion of the Singlet–Triplet Gap in Organic Molecules?
Inverted singlet-triplet gap systems (INVEST) have emerged as an intriguing class of materials with potential applications as emitters in Organic Light Emitting Diodes (OLEDs). Indeed, this type of material exhibits a negative singlet-triplet energy gap (Δ<i>E</i><sub>ST</sub>), i.e., an inversion of the lowest singlet (S<sub>1</sub>) and triplet (T<sub>1</sub>) excited states, that goes against Hund's rule. In this study, the Δ<i>E</i><sub>ST</sub> of a set of 15 INVEST molecules has been computed within the framework of Restricted Open-Shell Kohn-Sham (ROKS) and Delta Self-Consistent Field (ΔSCF) methods and the results were benchmarked against wavefunction-based calculations performed at the EOM-CCSD, NEVPT2, and SCS-CC2 levels. We find that ROKS always (and wrongly) predicts a positive Δ<i>E</i><sub>ST</sub> with global hybrid, meta-GGA, and long-range corrected functionals and that this is almost functional-independent. We also show that the only way to obtain an inverted gap was to resort to double hybrid functionals. In contrast, using the above-mentioned functionals, ΔSCF usually gives a negative Δ<i>E</i><sub>ST</sub>, although the results are largely functional-dependent. Overall, applying a ΔSCF method based on the PBE0 functional provides the lowest MSD and MAD with respect to the EOM-CCSD results. We further show that the singlet-triplet inversion is driven by different degrees of orbital relaxation in the singlet versus triplet state and that this is well captured by ΔSCF calculations. As a matter of fact, this orbital relaxation in ΔSCF somehow mimics the involvement of double and higher-order excitations in EOM-CCSD, which leads to a difference in spatial localization of the α and β spins, and thus introduces (local) spin polarization effects sourcing the negative Δ<i>E</i><sub>ST</sub>. However, care should be taken when using the ΔSCF method to screen materials with potential INVEST behavior in view of their limited quantitative correlation with reference EOM-CCSD results on the molecular data basis used here.
Authors
- Yoann Olivier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2193-1536)
- Gaetano Ricci (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0181-2513)
- Danillo Valverde (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1893-4579)
- J. C. Sancho-Garcı́a (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3867-1697)
- David Beljonne (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5082-9990)
Institutions
- University of Alicante (ES)
- University of Mons (BE)
- University of Namur (BE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Published
- 2025-03-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01600
- Citations
- 8
- Primary Topic
- Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 14.02
Funders
- Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
- Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
- Fonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’Agriculture