Can ΔSCF and ROKS DFT-Based Methods Predict the Inversion of the Singlet–Triplet Gap in Organic Molecules?

Inverted singlet-triplet gap systems (INVEST) have emerged as an intriguing class of materials with potential applications as emitters in Organic Light Emitting Diodes (OLEDs). Indeed, this type of material exhibits a negative singlet-triplet energy gap (Δ<i>E</i><sub>ST</sub>), i.e., an inversion of the lowest singlet (S<sub>1</sub>) and triplet (T<sub>1</sub>) excited states, that goes against Hund's rule. In this study, the Δ<i>E</i><sub>ST</sub> of a set of 15 INVEST molecules has been computed within the framework of Restricted Open-Shell Kohn-Sham (ROKS) and Delta Self-Consistent Field (ΔSCF) methods and the results were benchmarked against wavefunction-based calculations performed at the EOM-CCSD, NEVPT2, and SCS-CC2 levels. We find that ROKS always (and wrongly) predicts a positive Δ<i>E</i><sub>ST</sub> with global hybrid, meta-GGA, and long-range corrected functionals and that this is almost functional-independent. We also show that the only way to obtain an inverted gap was to resort to double hybrid functionals. In contrast, using the above-mentioned functionals, ΔSCF usually gives a negative Δ<i>E</i><sub>ST</sub>, although the results are largely functional-dependent. Overall, applying a ΔSCF method based on the PBE0 functional provides the lowest MSD and MAD with respect to the EOM-CCSD results. We further show that the singlet-triplet inversion is driven by different degrees of orbital relaxation in the singlet versus triplet state and that this is well captured by ΔSCF calculations. As a matter of fact, this orbital relaxation in ΔSCF somehow mimics the involvement of double and higher-order excitations in EOM-CCSD, which leads to a difference in spatial localization of the α and β spins, and thus introduces (local) spin polarization effects sourcing the negative Δ<i>E</i><sub>ST</sub>. However, care should be taken when using the ΔSCF method to screen materials with potential INVEST behavior in view of their limited quantitative correlation with reference EOM-CCSD results on the molecular data basis used here.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01600
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can ΔSCF and ROKS DFT-Based Methods Predict the Inversion of the Singlet–Triplet Gap in Organic Molecules?

Yoann Olivier, Gaetano Ricci, Danillo Valverde, J. C. Sancho-Garcı́a et al.
8 citations
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
14.02
article

Can ΔSCF and ROKS DFT-Based Methods Predict the Inversion of the Singlet–Triplet Gap in Organic Molecules?

Yoann Olivier, Gaetano Ricci, Danillo Valverde, J. C. Sancho-Garcı́a, David Beljonne
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Inverted singlet-triplet gap systems (INVEST) have emerged as an intriguing class of materials with potential applications as emitters in Organic Light Emitting Diodes (OLEDs). Indeed, this type of material exhibits a negative singlet-triplet energy gap (Δ<i>E</i><sub>ST</sub>), i.e., an inversion of the lowest singlet (S<sub>1</sub>) and triplet (T<sub>1</sub>) excited states, that goes against Hund's rule. In this study, the Δ<i>E</i><sub>ST</sub> of a set of 15 INVEST molecules has been computed within the framework of Restricted Open-Shell Kohn-Sham (ROKS) and Delta Self-Consistent Field (ΔSCF) methods and the results were benchmarked against wavefunction-based calculations performed at the EOM-CCSD, NEVPT2, and SCS-CC2 levels. We find that ROKS always (and wrongly) predicts a positive Δ<i>E</i><sub>ST</sub> with global hybrid, meta-GGA, and long-range corrected functionals and that this is almost functional-independent. We also show that the only way to obtain an inverted gap was to resort to double hybrid functionals. In contrast, using the above-mentioned functionals, ΔSCF usually gives a negative Δ<i>E</i><sub>ST</sub>, although the results are largely functional-dependent. Overall, applying a ΔSCF method based on the PBE0 functional provides the lowest MSD and MAD with respect to the EOM-CCSD results. We further show that the singlet-triplet inversion is driven by different degrees of orbital relaxation in the singlet versus triplet state and that this is well captured by ΔSCF calculations. As a matter of fact, this orbital relaxation in ΔSCF somehow mimics the involvement of double and higher-order excitations in EOM-CCSD, which leads to a difference in spatial localization of the α and β spins, and thus introduces (local) spin polarization effects sourcing the negative Δ<i>E</i><sub>ST</sub>. However, care should be taken when using the ΔSCF method to screen materials with potential INVEST behavior in view of their limited quantitative correlation with reference EOM-CCSD results on the molecular data basis used here.

Journal of Chemical Theory and ComputationVol. 21(5)
University of Alicante (ES), University of Mons (BE), University of Namur (BE)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS, Fonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
14.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.