Augmented Analysis of Parliamentary Debates

This paper delves into the SweTerror project’s use of word vectors to enhance the analysis of parliamentary debates concerning terrorism in Sweden during the electoral periods from 1968 to 2018. We focus on how word embeddings capture semantic shifts and the evolving context of key concepts like terror, terrorism, and extremism over time. By combining these computational tools with enriched metadata and document annotation as well as a mixedmethods and context-sensitive approach, we trace temporal changes in parliamentary discourse. The study demonstrates how generating vectors for distinct periods, such as electoral periods or parliamentary years, provides nuanced insights into conceptual transformations, including the introduction of the modern use of the concept of terrorism in the 1970s and the impact of the term violence-affirming extremism in the context of Islamism in the 2010s. We conclude by stressing that this approach allows for a more sophisticated analysis of linguistic and discursive patterns within Swedish parliamentary discourse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Humanities in the Nordic and Baltic Countries Publications
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5617/dhnbpub.12238
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Augmented Analysis of Parliamentary Debates

Magnus P. Ängsal, Mats Fridlund, Leif-Jöran Olsson, Daniel Brodén et al.
Digital Humanities in the Nordic and Baltic Countries Publications
E-Government and Public Services
article

Augmented Analysis of Parliamentary Debates

Magnus P. Ängsal, Mats Fridlund, Leif-Jöran Olsson, Daniel Brodén, Patrik Öhberg
article en

Abstract

This paper delves into the SweTerror project’s use of word vectors to enhance the analysis of parliamentary debates concerning terrorism in Sweden during the electoral periods from 1968 to 2018. We focus on how word embeddings capture semantic shifts and the evolving context of key concepts like terror, terrorism, and extremism over time. By combining these computational tools with enriched metadata and document annotation as well as a mixedmethods and context-sensitive approach, we trace temporal changes in parliamentary discourse. The study demonstrates how generating vectors for distinct periods, such as electoral periods or parliamentary years, provides nuanced insights into conceptual transformations, including the introduction of the modern use of the concept of terrorism in the 1970s and the impact of the term violence-affirming extremism in the context of Islamism in the 2010s. We conclude by stressing that this approach allows for a more sophisticated analysis of linguistic and discursive patterns within Swedish parliamentary discourse.

Digital Humanities in the Nordic and Baltic Countries PublicationsVol. 7(1)
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
E-Government and Public Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Augmented Analysis of Parliamentary Debates — Magnus P. Ängsal, Mats Fridlund, et al. · Digital Humanities in the Nordic and Baltic Countries Publications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS