Stochastic multi-objective optimization for dynamic timetable and track allocation at high-speed railway hubs
Train scheduling and track allocation are crucial for minimizing passenger flow conflicts, ensuring safety, and enhancing travel experience at railway hubs. This study presents a collaborative optimization model for railway hub operations, focusing on improving passenger transfer efficiency and minimizing arrival-departure track (ADT) utilization costs. A multi-objective hybrid model, referred to as COTADT, is developed to address spatiotemporal and stochastic constraints while balancing these two objectives. To solve this model efficiently, a customized augmented epsilon-constraint algorithm (CAEC) is introduced, utilizing augmented constraints and interval partitioning to generate Pareto-optimal solutions. The approach is validated with real-world data from the Hangzhou Hub, yielding significant improvements, including a 23.149% reduction in passenger transfer costs and a 7.101% reduction in ADT utilization costs. Comparative experiments demonstrate that CAEC outperforms heuristic algorithms in both solution quality and computational efficiency. This research provides a robust, scalable framework for enhancing operational performance and passenger experience at railway hubs.
Authors
- Bing Yan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4642-1754)
- Siyuan Qu
- Lu Huang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4177-9677)
- Wan Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5734-3432)
- Xiaolei Zou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7721-9364)
- Xiaodong Fan
Institutions
- Tongji University (CN)
- Shanghai University of Engineering Science (CN)
- Shenzhen Metro (China) (CN)
- China Railway Shanghai Design Institute Group (China) (CN)
- Shanghai Urban Transportation Design Institute (China) (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology
- Published
- 2025-03-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2025.02.011
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.48