Artificial intelligence and evidence for social work: will a robot steal your job?

Artificial intelligence (AI) is widely used to support decision making and interventions, arguably saving time, reducing bias and improving decision accuracy. The profession must urgently appraise the potential and pitfalls of this rapidly developing technology. This challenge was addressed at the 2024 European Social Work Research Association conference in Vilnius, at which the Evidence into Practice Special Interest Group focused on three contemporary AI developments: (1) large language models (LLMs); (2) AI- and robot-supported interventions; and (3) predictive risk modelling (PRM). This short ‘Reflection, exchange and dialogue’ article outlines the presentations, issues discussed and further reflections. Although LLMs have an impressive ability to manipulate language, essential case detail and analysis remain human tasks. There are robot technologies already helping people in the domains of disability and eldercare, and AI ‘language robots’ are being used favourably in low-risk mental health contexts, providing a non-judgemental (non-human) and ever-available ‘listener’ and ‘advisor’. PRMs raise many conflicting views. The ‘black box’ of AI may ‘hide’ systemic bias, though proponents argue that humans are biased too, so perfection is not an appropriate comparator. Our conclusion is that a priority is to examine, shape and regulate the interface between humans and computer algorithms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Social Work Research
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/27551768y2025d000000033
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence and evidence for social work: will a robot steal your job?

Beth Coulthard, Anne McGlade, Brian J. Taylor
2 citations
European Social Work Research
Resilience and Mental Health
4.61
article

Artificial intelligence and evidence for social work: will a robot steal your job?

Beth Coulthard, Anne McGlade, Brian J. Taylor
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is widely used to support decision making and interventions, arguably saving time, reducing bias and improving decision accuracy. The profession must urgently appraise the potential and pitfalls of this rapidly developing technology. This challenge was addressed at the 2024 European Social Work Research Association conference in Vilnius, at which the Evidence into Practice Special Interest Group focused on three contemporary AI developments: (1) large language models (LLMs); (2) AI- and robot-supported interventions; and (3) predictive risk modelling (PRM). This short ‘Reflection, exchange and dialogue’ article outlines the presentations, issues discussed and further reflections. Although LLMs have an impressive ability to manipulate language, essential case detail and analysis remain human tasks. There are robot technologies already helping people in the domains of disability and eldercare, and AI ‘language robots’ are being used favourably in low-risk mental health contexts, providing a non-judgemental (non-human) and ever-available ‘listener’ and ‘advisor’. PRMs raise many conflicting views. The ‘black box’ of AI may ‘hide’ systemic bias, though proponents argue that humans are biased too, so perfection is not an appropriate comparator. Our conclusion is that a priority is to examine, shape and regulate the interface between humans and computer algorithms.

European Social Work ResearchVol. 3(2)
University of Ulster (GB), Northern Ireland Council for Voluntary Action (GB)
University of Toronto
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Resilience and Mental Health
4.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.