Validation of a scale of attitudes towards gender violence in nursing students

Objective: Analyse the psychometric properties of a scale to evaluate attitudes towards gender violence in nursing students. Method: Cross-sectional observational study with 197 participants from various nursing schools and faculties. Supo’s taxonomy and Robles Garrote’s methodology, with the participation of nine experts, ensured content validity. Metric properties evaluated through pilot testing. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was used to determine reliability, validity, and internal consistency, along with tests such as Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity. Exploratory factor analysis of Principal Components and Rotation Method was performed: Oblimin with Kaiser Normalization. Results: The results revealed rigorous content validity, ensuring adequate representation to measure the construct. Internal consistency was demonstrated with a Cronbach’s alpha instrument reliability of 0.915. The KMO analysis and Bartlett’s test confirmed the suitability of the data for factorisation, identifying two factors associated with confrontation toward the aggressor and assistance toward the victim. These factors provided a solid conceptual structure for the scale. Conclusion: The tool was revealed to be effective in evaluating attitudes towards gender violence among university nursing students. Descriptors: validation studies; behaviour rating scale; attitude of health personnel; nursing students; gender-based violence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Gender-Based Violence
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/23986808y2025d000000064
Primary Topic
Workplace Violence and Bullying
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of a scale of attitudes towards gender violence in nursing students

Irma Cortés Escárcega, Elsy Guadalupe Vega Morales, María de los Ángeles Torres Lagunas, Guillermina Arenas Montaño et al.
Journal of Gender-Based Violence
Workplace Violence and Bullying
article

Validation of a scale of attitudes towards gender violence in nursing students

Irma Cortés Escárcega, Elsy Guadalupe Vega Morales, María de los Ángeles Torres Lagunas, Guillermina Arenas Montaño, L. F. Rodríguez, Alfredo López Ordaz
article en

Abstract

Objective: Analyse the psychometric properties of a scale to evaluate attitudes towards gender violence in nursing students. Method: Cross-sectional observational study with 197 participants from various nursing schools and faculties. Supo’s taxonomy and Robles Garrote’s methodology, with the participation of nine experts, ensured content validity. Metric properties evaluated through pilot testing. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was used to determine reliability, validity, and internal consistency, along with tests such as Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity. Exploratory factor analysis of Principal Components and Rotation Method was performed: Oblimin with Kaiser Normalization. Results: The results revealed rigorous content validity, ensuring adequate representation to measure the construct. Internal consistency was demonstrated with a Cronbach’s alpha instrument reliability of 0.915. The KMO analysis and Bartlett’s test confirmed the suitability of the data for factorisation, identifying two factors associated with confrontation toward the aggressor and assistance toward the victim. These factors provided a solid conceptual structure for the scale. Conclusion: The tool was revealed to be effective in evaluating attitudes towards gender violence among university nursing students. Descriptors: validation studies; behaviour rating scale; attitude of health personnel; nursing students; gender-based violence.

Journal of Gender-Based Violence
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (MX), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Workplace Violence and Bullying
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.