Connecting habitats in European agricultural landscapes: Farmers’ spatial preferences for linear wildlife corridors

• Farmers prefer to place measures to minimise disturbance and maximise productivity. • Landscape characteristics guide farmers’ decisions. • Habitat connectivity is a relevant concept for farmers. • Local farming traditions and practices are crucial. • The study results can help to reduce transaction costs by targeting likely adopters. Habitat fragmentation in agricultural landscapes threatens biodiversity. Enhancing landscape connectivity across cultivated areas requires a thorough understanding of farmers’ spatial considerations and their willingness to create semi-natural habitats. We therefore conducted a spatial choice experiment with farmers from ten European countries to assess their preferences for placing linear wildlife habitats (hedgerows and wildflower strips) at the field scale under different scenarios, as well as the role of farm and personal factors. A total of 471 responses were analysed using multinomial logistic regression and generalised linear mixed models. The results indicate that landscape conditions, including field shape, slope, soil quality, and pre-existing landscape features, exert a significant influence on farmers’ decisions, as do the size of machinery, cultural regions, attitudes towards biodiversity, and type of intervention. On the other hand, no statistical significance was found for other variables. In general, farmers’ choices were driven by a desire to minimise disturbance to field work, optimise productivity, increase biodiversity, and address specific environmental challenges. The insights into farmers’ decision-making from this study can inform ecological network planning to reduce transaction costs by pre-selecting likely adopters, and to mitigate resistance and lower financial compensation by identifying best-fit options aligned with farmers’ practices. Integrating these findings into geospatial models could improve predictions of the impact of spatially targeted biodiversity conservation strategies on landscape composition and future biodiversity trends in agricultural areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Landscape and Urban Planning
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105325
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Connecting habitats in European agricultural landscapes: Farmers’ spatial preferences for linear wildlife corridors

Jonathan R. Rhodes, Fabian Klebl, Annette Piorr, Kati Häfner
5 citations
Landscape and Urban Planning
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
5.53
article

Connecting habitats in European agricultural landscapes: Farmers’ spatial preferences for linear wildlife corridors

Jonathan R. Rhodes, Fabian Klebl, Annette Piorr, Kati Häfner
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• Farmers prefer to place measures to minimise disturbance and maximise productivity. • Landscape characteristics guide farmers’ decisions. • Habitat connectivity is a relevant concept for farmers. • Local farming traditions and practices are crucial. • The study results can help to reduce transaction costs by targeting likely adopters. Habitat fragmentation in agricultural landscapes threatens biodiversity. Enhancing landscape connectivity across cultivated areas requires a thorough understanding of farmers’ spatial considerations and their willingness to create semi-natural habitats. We therefore conducted a spatial choice experiment with farmers from ten European countries to assess their preferences for placing linear wildlife habitats (hedgerows and wildflower strips) at the field scale under different scenarios, as well as the role of farm and personal factors. A total of 471 responses were analysed using multinomial logistic regression and generalised linear mixed models. The results indicate that landscape conditions, including field shape, slope, soil quality, and pre-existing landscape features, exert a significant influence on farmers’ decisions, as do the size of machinery, cultural regions, attitudes towards biodiversity, and type of intervention. On the other hand, no statistical significance was found for other variables. In general, farmers’ choices were driven by a desire to minimise disturbance to field work, optimise productivity, increase biodiversity, and address specific environmental challenges. The insights into farmers’ decision-making from this study can inform ecological network planning to reduce transaction costs by pre-selecting likely adopters, and to mitigate resistance and lower financial compensation by identifying best-fit options aligned with farmers’ practices. Integrating these findings into geospatial models could improve predictions of the impact of spatially targeted biodiversity conservation strategies on landscape composition and future biodiversity trends in agricultural areas.

Landscape and Urban PlanningVol. 258
Queensland University of Technology (AU), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (DE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
5.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.