Can biomass-derived chars serve as a viable alternative to commercial inorganic fertilizers?

The increasing reliance on commercial inorganic fertilizers has raised significant environmental and economic concerns, including soil degradation, nutrient leaching, water pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions. This review critically evaluates biomass-derived chars produced via thermochemical processes, i.e., pyrolysis, gasification, and hydrothermal carbonization, as potential alternatives to synthetic fertilizers. Among the three biomass-derived chars, biochar stands out as the most viable option for soil amendment due to its high stability, nutrient retention capacity, and long-term carbon sequestration benefits. Gasification char, despite its high porosity and adsorption capacity, often lacks bioavailable nutrients, whereas hydrochar, though rich in organic compounds, poses challenges related to stability and phytotoxicity. Biochar application has been shown to significantly reduce N2O emissions, enhance soil water retention, and mitigate nutrient runoff, offering clear environmental advantages over conventional fertilizers. Moreover, biochar has transitioned from an experimental soil amendment to a commercially available product with increasing adoption in agriculture worldwide, further reinforcing its practical viability. However, large-scale implementation still faces economic and logistical constraints, including high production costs, transportation inefficiencies, and regulatory uncertainties. Addressing these challenges through policy incentives such as subsidies and carbon credits can enhance the economic feasibility of biochar production and application. Given these findings, this review focuses on biochar as the most practical and sustainable alternative to commercial inorganic fertilizers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biofuel Research Journal
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18331/brj2025.12.1.5
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Phosphorus and nutrient management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can biomass-derived chars serve as a viable alternative to commercial inorganic fertilizers?

Gözde Duman, Pouya Mohammadi, Beatrice Kulli, Fırat Kömekçi et al.
7 citations
Biofuel Research Journal
Phosphorus and nutrient management
6.98
article

Can biomass-derived chars serve as a viable alternative to commercial inorganic fertilizers?

Gözde Duman, Pouya Mohammadi, Beatrice Kulli, Fırat Kömekçi, S. Román, Nik Nazri Nik Ghazali, Chau Huyen Dang, R. Cengiz Akdeniz, Caroline De Tender
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The increasing reliance on commercial inorganic fertilizers has raised significant environmental and economic concerns, including soil degradation, nutrient leaching, water pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions. This review critically evaluates biomass-derived chars produced via thermochemical processes, i.e., pyrolysis, gasification, and hydrothermal carbonization, as potential alternatives to synthetic fertilizers. Among the three biomass-derived chars, biochar stands out as the most viable option for soil amendment due to its high stability, nutrient retention capacity, and long-term carbon sequestration benefits. Gasification char, despite its high porosity and adsorption capacity, often lacks bioavailable nutrients, whereas hydrochar, though rich in organic compounds, poses challenges related to stability and phytotoxicity. Biochar application has been shown to significantly reduce N2O emissions, enhance soil water retention, and mitigate nutrient runoff, offering clear environmental advantages over conventional fertilizers. Moreover, biochar has transitioned from an experimental soil amendment to a commercially available product with increasing adoption in agriculture worldwide, further reinforcing its practical viability. However, large-scale implementation still faces economic and logistical constraints, including high production costs, transportation inefficiencies, and regulatory uncertainties. Addressing these challenges through policy incentives such as subsidies and carbon credits can enhance the economic feasibility of biochar production and application. Given these findings, this review focuses on biochar as the most practical and sustainable alternative to commercial inorganic fertilizers.

Biofuel Research JournalVol. 12(01)
Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (MY), Ghent University (BE), Ege University (TR), Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE), Universidad de Extremadura (ES), ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH)
Universiteit Gent, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Phosphorus and nutrient management
6.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.