Methane production and microbial adaptation in high-load vacuum-enhanced anaerobic digestion: Addressing ammonia and propionate toxicity
• IntensiCarb technology processed 6 times the OLR of conventional AD. • Methane yield decreased linearly with increasing propionate concentrations over 2.20 g/L. • Side-stream vacuum increased ammonia toxicity resilience by a factor of 3. • Population of propionate degraders in IC was different from conventional AD. • Methanosaeta dominated conventional AD, while Methanosarcinaceae dominated IC reactors. Ex-situ vacuum-enhanced anaerobic digestion (IntensiCarb-AD) of primary and thickened waste activated sludge (PS/TWAS) was tested at an organic loading rate (OLR) of 11.0–11.3 kg COD/m 3 -d. IC-AD reactors with similar solids retention times (SRT = 20 d) and OLR, were operated at hydraulic retention times (HRT) of 5 days (IF defined as SRT/HRT of 4) and 3.33 days (IF6). IF4 had a higher steady-state methane yield of 0.214 ± 0.009 L-CH 4 /gCOD fed compared to 0.148 ± 0.029 L-CH 4 /gCOD fed in IF6. COD removals of 53.5 %±2.25 % were obtained with IF4 but fluctuated with IF6 (37.0 %±7.25 %). Both IF4 and IF6 processed 6 times the OLR of a conventional AD with comparable volatile solids reduction efficiency. The relative instability in IF6 was linked to a greater reduction in microbial activity due to longer vacuum application and higher propionate concentrations (>2.20 g/L), which affected the performance of hydrogenotrophic methanogens. Methanosarcinaceae and Methanobacteriaceae populations were 10.8 % and 35.2 % more abundant in IF4 than in IF6, respectively, corroborating the significantly higher methane yields observed in IF4 compared with IF6. Ammonia recovery efficiencies of 52.0 % and 49.1 % were observed in IF4 and IF6 respectively. Batch ammonia toxicity tests indicated a higher inhibitory constant (K i ) for IC-AD (5.60–5.70 gN/L) compared to conventional AD (1.90 gN/L). Acetate degradation was effective even with ammonia and propionate concentrations as high as 2,000 mg/L and 4,000 mg/L, respectively.
Authors
- Christopher Muller (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3855-3375)
- Ali Khadir
- George Nakhla (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6807-129X)
- Wayne J. Parker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0870-7302)
- Eun-Kyung Jang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4925-5018)
- Domenico Santoro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9561-4894)
- Katherine Y. Bell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9039-7245)
- Ahmed Al‐Omari (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3776-5053)
- Basem Haroun (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0259-1276)
- John Walton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8156-1645)
Institutions
- Western University (CA)
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- USP Technologies (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Brown and Caldwell (United States) (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Chemical Engineering Journal
- Published
- 2025-03-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.161105
- Citations
- 7
- Primary Topic
- Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 7.04
Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada