Reliability and validity of children's basic motor skills testing: a systematic literature review

Background: Movement is considered natural part of life, because it affects cognitive, physical and social development. Physically active lifestyle supported by basic motor skills. There are several tests that can assess performance of basic motor skills. Purposes: The research aims critically assess, compare, and summarize the quality of measurement properties of each child's fundamental movement skill test. Method: The MEDLINE, Pubmed, SciELO, Taylor & Francis, Science Direct, Springer, SAGE, ResearchGate, and EBSCOhost databases were searched for the period 2014-2024 using specific search terms for those relevant to children's fundamental movement skill testing. The COSMIN Risk of Bias (RoB) Checklist, COSMIN good measurement properties criteria and the GRADE approach were used to assess the quality of several children's fundamental movement skill tests. Result: The search results resulted in 253 articles identified, 9 articles included. The 9 articles described construct, validity and/or reliability. The assessment of 9 tests has evidence of risk of bias extremely serious (n=3), very serious (n=1), serious (n=1), and no (n=4); evidence of grade high (n=4), moderate (n=1), low (n=1), and very low (n=3), and evidence of measurement property sufficient (n=1), insufficient (n=2), and indeterminate (n=6). Conclusion: MOBAK-3 is recommended as test of children's basic motor skills that has best evidence quality, because there is no bias risk in research methodology, high grade category, and sufficient quality of results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Retos
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v65.112787
Primary Topic
Children's Physical and Motor Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability and validity of children's basic motor skills testing: a systematic literature review

Slamet Riyadi, Fadilah Umar, Agus Kristiyanto, Manshuralhudlori Manshuralhudlori et al.
1 links
Retos
Children's Physical and Motor Development
article

Reliability and validity of children's basic motor skills testing: a systematic literature review

Slamet Riyadi, Fadilah Umar, Agus Kristiyanto, Manshuralhudlori Manshuralhudlori, Febriani Fajar Ekawati, Rony Syaifullah
article en

Abstract

Background: Movement is considered natural part of life, because it affects cognitive, physical and social development. Physically active lifestyle supported by basic motor skills. There are several tests that can assess performance of basic motor skills. Purposes: The research aims critically assess, compare, and summarize the quality of measurement properties of each child's fundamental movement skill test. Method: The MEDLINE, Pubmed, SciELO, Taylor & Francis, Science Direct, Springer, SAGE, ResearchGate, and EBSCOhost databases were searched for the period 2014-2024 using specific search terms for those relevant to children's fundamental movement skill testing. The COSMIN Risk of Bias (RoB) Checklist, COSMIN good measurement properties criteria and the GRADE approach were used to assess the quality of several children's fundamental movement skill tests. Result: The search results resulted in 253 articles identified, 9 articles included. The 9 articles described construct, validity and/or reliability. The assessment of 9 tests has evidence of risk of bias extremely serious (n=3), very serious (n=1), serious (n=1), and no (n=4); evidence of grade high (n=4), moderate (n=1), low (n=1), and very low (n=3), and evidence of measurement property sufficient (n=1), insufficient (n=2), and indeterminate (n=6). Conclusion: MOBAK-3 is recommended as test of children's basic motor skills that has best evidence quality, because there is no bias risk in research methodology, high grade category, and sufficient quality of results.

RetosVol. 65
Sebelas Maret University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Children's Physical and Motor Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reliability and validity of children's basic motor skills testing: a systematic literature review — Slamet Riyadi, Fadilah Umar, et al. · Retos (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS