Perspectives on AI in the British and Slovenian parliament

Parliamentary debates illustrate relevant legislative issues and how they change over time. The paper presents debates on artificial intelligence in the British and Slovenian parliaments. We analyze ten years (2015-2024) of parliamentary debates, observing semantic networks and significant words of artificial intelligence debates. We conduct a descriptive comparative analysis, showing the differences in the debates between a non-EU country with a strong AI sector (the UK) and an EU country with a weak AI sector (Slovenia). We conclude that in the former, the debate is more sectoral and focused on supporting businesses, while in the latter, the debate is linked to EU policies and focused on education and digitization. A comparative analysis of the two approaches can serve as a basis for diversifying AI policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Humanities in the Nordic and Baltic Countries Publications
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5617/dhnbpub.12236
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectives on AI in the British and Slovenian parliament

Ajda Pretnar Žagar, David Moats
Digital Humanities in the Nordic and Baltic Countries Publications
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Perspectives on AI in the British and Slovenian parliament

Ajda Pretnar Žagar, David Moats
article en

Abstract

Parliamentary debates illustrate relevant legislative issues and how they change over time. The paper presents debates on artificial intelligence in the British and Slovenian parliaments. We analyze ten years (2015-2024) of parliamentary debates, observing semantic networks and significant words of artificial intelligence debates. We conduct a descriptive comparative analysis, showing the differences in the debates between a non-EU country with a strong AI sector (the UK) and an EU country with a weak AI sector (Slovenia). We conclude that in the former, the debate is more sectoral and focused on supporting businesses, while in the latter, the debate is linked to EU policies and focused on education and digitization. A comparative analysis of the two approaches can serve as a basis for diversifying AI policies.

Digital Humanities in the Nordic and Baltic Countries PublicationsVol. 7(1)
University of Ljubljana (SI), National Consumer Research Centre (FI)
European Commission, Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Perspectives on AI in the British and Slovenian parliament — Ajda Pretnar Žagar, David Moats · Digital Humanities in the Nordic and Baltic Countries Publications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS