Dynamics of fine-root decomposition and its response to site nutrient regimes in boreal drained-peatland and mineral-soil forests

Fine roots may contribute significantly to soil organic matter pool in forest ecosystems; however, their decomposition is often overlooked in studies on litter decomposition and carbon (C) and nutrient cycling. To address this gap, we conducted a five-year litterbag experiment encompassing three representative tree species ( Pinus sylvestris , Picea abies , Betula pubescens ), and one fern species ( Dryopteris carthusiana ) across various boreal peatland forest types, comparing them with corresponding rates in upland forests on mineral soils. Litterbags were recovered annually, and mass remaining was first characterized by three different model types with varying complexity. Based on this preliminary screening, we chose for the final analyses a double-exponential model, which examined parameters A , i.e. the proportion of material in the slow-decomposing pool, k 1 , the mass loss rate of the slow-decomposing pool, and k 2 , the rate of mass loss in the fast-decomposing pool. Fine-root decomposition exhibited significant variation with soil type and nutrient regime. In mineral soil, lower k 1 values indicated slower decomposition in more nutrient-rich sites. Conversely, in peat soil, higher k 1 values indicated faster decomposition in more nutrient-rich sites. Soil depth and root diameter emerged as influential factors, with deeper layers and larger diameter roots exhibiting slower decomposition rates. Species-specific effects were also significant, with D. carthusiana exhibiting the lowest A value, indicating faster initial decomposition compared to tree species. Among the tree species, differences in A value were minor, with variation observed primarily in k 1 value, where P. abies had the lowest rate. No significant effects on k 2 value were observed. These findings underscore the complex interplay between species characteristics, soil type, site nutrient regimes, and root morphology in determining fine-root decomposition dynamics in boreal forests. Importantly, our results show that soil type must be considered when modeling decomposition dynamics. • Fine-root decomposition varies significantly by soil type and nutrient regime. • Fine-root decay faster in nutrient-rich vs. nutrient-poor peatlands. • Fine-root decay slower in nutrient-rich vs. nutrient-poor mineral-soil forests. • Soil depth and root diameter are key factors influencing fine-root decomposition. • Species-specific traits significantly affect the decomposition of fine roots.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Forest Ecology and Management
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122564
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamics of fine-root decomposition and its response to site nutrient regimes in boreal drained-peatland and mineral-soil forests

Aino Korrensalo, Päivi Mäkiranta, Paavo Ojanen, Raija Laiho et al.
2 citations
Forest Ecology and Management
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
3.43
article

Dynamics of fine-root decomposition and its response to site nutrient regimes in boreal drained-peatland and mineral-soil forests

Aino Korrensalo, Päivi Mäkiranta, Paavo Ojanen, Raija Laiho, Wei He
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Fine roots may contribute significantly to soil organic matter pool in forest ecosystems; however, their decomposition is often overlooked in studies on litter decomposition and carbon (C) and nutrient cycling. To address this gap, we conducted a five-year litterbag experiment encompassing three representative tree species ( Pinus sylvestris , Picea abies , Betula pubescens ), and one fern species ( Dryopteris carthusiana ) across various boreal peatland forest types, comparing them with corresponding rates in upland forests on mineral soils. Litterbags were recovered annually, and mass remaining was first characterized by three different model types with varying complexity. Based on this preliminary screening, we chose for the final analyses a double-exponential model, which examined parameters A , i.e. the proportion of material in the slow-decomposing pool, k 1 , the mass loss rate of the slow-decomposing pool, and k 2 , the rate of mass loss in the fast-decomposing pool. Fine-root decomposition exhibited significant variation with soil type and nutrient regime. In mineral soil, lower k 1 values indicated slower decomposition in more nutrient-rich sites. Conversely, in peat soil, higher k 1 values indicated faster decomposition in more nutrient-rich sites. Soil depth and root diameter emerged as influential factors, with deeper layers and larger diameter roots exhibiting slower decomposition rates. Species-specific effects were also significant, with D. carthusiana exhibiting the lowest A value, indicating faster initial decomposition compared to tree species. Among the tree species, differences in A value were minor, with variation observed primarily in k 1 value, where P. abies had the lowest rate. No significant effects on k 2 value were observed. These findings underscore the complex interplay between species characteristics, soil type, site nutrient regimes, and root morphology in determining fine-root decomposition dynamics in boreal forests. Importantly, our results show that soil type must be considered when modeling decomposition dynamics. • Fine-root decomposition varies significantly by soil type and nutrient regime. • Fine-root decay faster in nutrient-rich vs. nutrient-poor peatlands. • Fine-root decay slower in nutrient-rich vs. nutrient-poor mineral-soil forests. • Soil depth and root diameter are key factors influencing fine-root decomposition. • Species-specific traits significantly affect the decomposition of fine roots.

Forest Ecology and ManagementVol. 582
European Commission, Maj ja Tor Nesslingin Säätiö, Niemi-säätiö
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.