A two-factor scale of perceived power

Power-the capacity to influence outcomes-manifests in two distinct forms: social power, defined as the perceived ability to control others' behaviors and decisions, and personal power, characterized by the capacity to resist unwanted external influence and maintain autonomy. Theoretically, these dimensions are rooted in different needs, and thus are likely to differentially predict certain behaviors. However, existing measures often conflate these dimensions, limiting insights into their unique behavioral effects. To address this issue, the present research has developed and validated a two-factor scale of perceived power to completely capture both facets of power across twelve studies (N = 2,878). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses support the scale's structure, while reliability and validity tests demonstrate its robustness. Following assessments of the structure of the scale, its validity was demonstrated across multiple studies: Study 1 establishes the orthogonality of personal and social power through experimental manipulation, Study 2 reveals that personal power increases proactive advice-seeking, whereas social power reduces the tendency to solicit advice, and Study 3 demonstrates that social power amplifies negative reactions to service failures, while personal power does not. These divergent outcomes underscore the distinct roles of personal and social power, highlighting the scale's utility for advancing research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319412
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A two-factor scale of perceived power

Myojoong Kim, F. May
PLoS ONE
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

A two-factor scale of perceived power

Myojoong Kim, F. May
article en

Abstract

Power-the capacity to influence outcomes-manifests in two distinct forms: social power, defined as the perceived ability to control others' behaviors and decisions, and personal power, characterized by the capacity to resist unwanted external influence and maintain autonomy. Theoretically, these dimensions are rooted in different needs, and thus are likely to differentially predict certain behaviors. However, existing measures often conflate these dimensions, limiting insights into their unique behavioral effects. To address this issue, the present research has developed and validated a two-factor scale of perceived power to completely capture both facets of power across twelve studies (N = 2,878). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses support the scale's structure, while reliability and validity tests demonstrate its robustness. Following assessments of the structure of the scale, its validity was demonstrated across multiple studies: Study 1 establishes the orthogonality of personal and social power through experimental manipulation, Study 2 reveals that personal power increases proactive advice-seeking, whereas social power reduces the tendency to solicit advice, and Study 3 demonstrates that social power amplifies negative reactions to service failures, while personal power does not. These divergent outcomes underscore the distinct roles of personal and social power, highlighting the scale's utility for advancing research.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(2)
Virginia Tech (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.