Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Diversity: Exploring Implications for HR and Organizational Management

Amid the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI), organizations are continuously confronted with new challenges. This paper delves into the impact of discriminative and generative AI on organizational and societal diversity. To replicate and extend previous research (e.g., Atari et al., 2023), which found that ChatGPT and other generative AI models exhibit WEIRD cultural biases, across various generative AI models, including GPT-4o, Llama 3.2, EEVE, and EXAONE 3.5. The findings reveal discrepancies in algorithmic transparency and the extent of Western-centric data training across these models. While some models show a reduction in bias compared to earlier versions, notable gaps remain in representing certain cultural contexts. AI is categorized into discriminative and generative types.. Discriminative AI enhances predictive and classification capabilities through supervised learning, facilitating automation and personalized services; however, the accumulation of data bias poses a threat to organizational diversity. Generative AI, by leveraging unsupervised and reinforcement learning, generates creative ideas and content, fostering innovation but simultaneously carrying the risk of value-laden biases stemming from training data. This study provides a detailed analysis of the potential impacts and risks of both AI types across HR processes, including recruitment, promotion, and performance evaluation. Furthermore, it incorporates regulatory and ethical frameworks related to human capital disclosure and AI governance, addressing key considerations for organizations in ensuring AI transparency and fairness. By highlighting the complementary use of discriminative and generative AI, this paper suggests pathways for organizations to achieve creativity, operational efficiency, and inclusiveness, contributing valuable theoretical and practical insights.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Academy of Management
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26856/kjom.2025.33.1.1
Primary Topic
Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Diversity: Exploring Implications for HR and Organizational Management

Joonghak Lee, K.W. Kim, Sungjun Kim
Korean Academy of Management
Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
article

Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Diversity: Exploring Implications for HR and Organizational Management

Joonghak Lee, K.W. Kim, Sungjun Kim
article en

Abstract

Amid the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI), organizations are continuously confronted with new challenges. This paper delves into the impact of discriminative and generative AI on organizational and societal diversity. To replicate and extend previous research (e.g., Atari et al., 2023), which found that ChatGPT and other generative AI models exhibit WEIRD cultural biases, across various generative AI models, including GPT-4o, Llama 3.2, EEVE, and EXAONE 3.5. The findings reveal discrepancies in algorithmic transparency and the extent of Western-centric data training across these models. While some models show a reduction in bias compared to earlier versions, notable gaps remain in representing certain cultural contexts. AI is categorized into discriminative and generative types.. Discriminative AI enhances predictive and classification capabilities through supervised learning, facilitating automation and personalized services; however, the accumulation of data bias poses a threat to organizational diversity. Generative AI, by leveraging unsupervised and reinforcement learning, generates creative ideas and content, fostering innovation but simultaneously carrying the risk of value-laden biases stemming from training data. This study provides a detailed analysis of the potential impacts and risks of both AI types across HR processes, including recruitment, promotion, and performance evaluation. Furthermore, it incorporates regulatory and ethical frameworks related to human capital disclosure and AI governance, addressing key considerations for organizations in ensuring AI transparency and fairness. By highlighting the complementary use of discriminative and generative AI, this paper suggests pathways for organizations to achieve creativity, operational efficiency, and inclusiveness, contributing valuable theoretical and practical insights.

Korean Academy of ManagementVol. 33(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Diversity: Exploring Implications for HR and Organizational Management — Joonghak Lee, K.W. Kim, et al. · Korean Academy of Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS