CMT deposition of stainless steel: effects of process parameters on energy demand and microstructure

Abstract Sustainable manufacturing is gaining momentum as industries strive to minimize the environmental impact of manufacturing and improve sustainability by maximizing the resource efficiency and reducing waste. Additive manufacturing (AM), as a technology that demands fewer raw materials and produces less waste compared to more traditional manufacturing approaches, could inherently support these goals. Among the different AM processes, wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) and cold metal transfer (CMT) have shown promise, particularly in the steel production field, where forging, casting and machining have so far been the predominant processes. In order to achieve an effective transition to sustainable manufacturing practices, it is necessary to fully characterize the CMT process, not only from an energy perspective but also by ensuring a high material utilization efficiency and product quality. In this study, the main process parameters have been varied in the deposition of single beads and multilayer structures made of AWS ER 308L Si, and the results have been analyzed in terms of specific energy consumption, microstructure and microhardness of the as-built structures. Overall, the study concludes that the process parameters primarily control energy consumption and the heat applied to the components, rather than the resulting microstructure, which, instead, is influenced more by thermal cycling resulting from the layer-by-layer deposition process. This suggests that process parameters could be selected with a focus on energy savings without significant adverse effects on material properties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Additive Manufacturing
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-025-01022-7
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CMT deposition of stainless steel: effects of process parameters on energy demand and microstructure

Luca Settineri, Vincenzo Tebaldo, Paolo C. Priarone, Angioletta R. Catalano et al.
4 citations
Progress in Additive Manufacturing
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
2.85
article

CMT deposition of stainless steel: effects of process parameters on energy demand and microstructure

Luca Settineri, Vincenzo Tebaldo, Paolo C. Priarone, Angioletta R. Catalano, Maria Giulia Faga
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Sustainable manufacturing is gaining momentum as industries strive to minimize the environmental impact of manufacturing and improve sustainability by maximizing the resource efficiency and reducing waste. Additive manufacturing (AM), as a technology that demands fewer raw materials and produces less waste compared to more traditional manufacturing approaches, could inherently support these goals. Among the different AM processes, wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) and cold metal transfer (CMT) have shown promise, particularly in the steel production field, where forging, casting and machining have so far been the predominant processes. In order to achieve an effective transition to sustainable manufacturing practices, it is necessary to fully characterize the CMT process, not only from an energy perspective but also by ensuring a high material utilization efficiency and product quality. In this study, the main process parameters have been varied in the deposition of single beads and multilayer structures made of AWS ER 308L Si, and the results have been analyzed in terms of specific energy consumption, microstructure and microhardness of the as-built structures. Overall, the study concludes that the process parameters primarily control energy consumption and the heat applied to the components, rather than the resulting microstructure, which, instead, is influenced more by thermal cycling resulting from the layer-by-layer deposition process. This suggests that process parameters could be selected with a focus on energy savings without significant adverse effects on material properties.

Progress in Additive ManufacturingVol. 10(9)
Politecnico di Torino (IT), National Research Council (IT)
Politecnico di Torino, Regione Piemonte
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
2.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.