Will I stay or will I go? Eye morphology predicts individual migratory propensity in a partial migrant

Billions of animals undertake migratory journeys every year, with powerful consequences for ecosystem dynamics. Key behaviours that enable successful migration are often guided by the visual system. The amount and quality of information that animals can extract from visual scenes are directly related to structural eye size-larger eyes can house larger pupils, enhancing light-gathering capacity and vision by improving visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. Migration should exert strong demands on individual visual performance, for example via foraging, antipredator benefits or navigational requirements. Yet, it remains elusive whether variations in eye morphology and corresponding visual capabilities are associated with migratory propensity. Here, we capitalize upon intra-population variation in migratory propensity (also known as partial migration) in roach, a common freshwater fish, to directly test for migration-associated variation in image-forming eyes within a species. In a multi-year field study tracking the migration decisions of over 2000 individuals in two different lake systems, we found that relative pupil size was positively associated with individual migration propensity. Computational simulations of the visual ecology associated with the observed differences in pupil size show that migrants have an extended visual detection range and that the performance gain is most pronounced for viewing small targets (e.g. planktonic prey) under low-light conditions. These results suggest that the larger pupils of migrants represent an adaptation for increased foraging efficiency to aid in the accumulation of critical pre-migratory energy reserves. Together, our anatomical and functional findings provide new perspectives on visual system design in relation to individual-level migratory decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Ecology
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.70015
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Will I stay or will I go? Eye morphology predicts individual migratory propensity in a partial migrant

Christian Skov, Jakob Brodersen, Christer Brönmark, Kaj Hulthén et al.
3 citations
Journal of Animal Ecology
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
6.94
article

Will I stay or will I go? Eye morphology predicts individual migratory propensity in a partial migrant

Christian Skov, Jakob Brodersen, Christer Brönmark, Kaj Hulthén, Lars‐Anders Hansson, P. Anders Nilsson, R. Brian Langerhans, Cornelia Martel, Henrik Baktoft, Dan‐E. Nilsson
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Billions of animals undertake migratory journeys every year, with powerful consequences for ecosystem dynamics. Key behaviours that enable successful migration are often guided by the visual system. The amount and quality of information that animals can extract from visual scenes are directly related to structural eye size-larger eyes can house larger pupils, enhancing light-gathering capacity and vision by improving visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. Migration should exert strong demands on individual visual performance, for example via foraging, antipredator benefits or navigational requirements. Yet, it remains elusive whether variations in eye morphology and corresponding visual capabilities are associated with migratory propensity. Here, we capitalize upon intra-population variation in migratory propensity (also known as partial migration) in roach, a common freshwater fish, to directly test for migration-associated variation in image-forming eyes within a species. In a multi-year field study tracking the migration decisions of over 2000 individuals in two different lake systems, we found that relative pupil size was positively associated with individual migration propensity. Computational simulations of the visual ecology associated with the observed differences in pupil size show that migrants have an extended visual detection range and that the performance gain is most pronounced for viewing small targets (e.g. planktonic prey) under low-light conditions. These results suggest that the larger pupils of migrants represent an adaptation for increased foraging efficiency to aid in the accumulation of critical pre-migratory energy reserves. Together, our anatomical and functional findings provide new perspectives on visual system design in relation to individual-level migratory decision-making.

Journal of Animal EcologyVol. 94(5)
University of Bern (CH), North Carolina State University (US), Lund University (SE), Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Vetenskapsrådet
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
6.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.