Male coaches increase the risk-taking of female teams—Evidence from the NCAA

We analyze the effect of the coach’s gender on risk-taking in women’s NCAA basketball teams. Coach’s gender has a sizable and significant effect on the team’s risk-taking, a finding that is robust to an instrumental variable approach. We find that women’s teams with a male head coach are 6 percentage points more likely to take risk than women’s teams with a female head coach. This gap is persistent within games and does not change with intermediate performance. Since risk-taking has a positive effect on winning a game, female head coaches could improve their team’s success by taking more risk. • The coach’s gender has a sizable and significant effect on the team’s risk-taking, a finding that is robust to an instrumental variable approach. • Women’s teams with a male head coach make risky attempts 6 percentage points more often than women’s teams with a female head coach. • The difference is persistent within games and does not change with intermediate performance. • Risk-taking has a positive effect on winning a game and teams with a female coach would win more often if they chose risky attempts more often. • The gap in risk-taking of female teams by their coach’s gender is the greater, the more experienced their head coach is.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Labour Economics
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2025.102692
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sports Analytics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Male coaches increase the risk-taking of female teams—Evidence from the NCAA

Mario Lackner, René Böheim, Christoph Freudenthaler
1 citations
Labour Economics
Sports Analytics and Performance
3.13
article

Male coaches increase the risk-taking of female teams—Evidence from the NCAA

Mario Lackner, René Böheim, Christoph Freudenthaler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We analyze the effect of the coach’s gender on risk-taking in women’s NCAA basketball teams. Coach’s gender has a sizable and significant effect on the team’s risk-taking, a finding that is robust to an instrumental variable approach. We find that women’s teams with a male head coach are 6 percentage points more likely to take risk than women’s teams with a female head coach. This gap is persistent within games and does not change with intermediate performance. Since risk-taking has a positive effect on winning a game, female head coaches could improve their team’s success by taking more risk. • The coach’s gender has a sizable and significant effect on the team’s risk-taking, a finding that is robust to an instrumental variable approach. • Women’s teams with a male head coach make risky attempts 6 percentage points more often than women’s teams with a female head coach. • The difference is persistent within games and does not change with intermediate performance. • Risk-taking has a positive effect on winning a game and teams with a female coach would win more often if they chose risky attempts more often. • The gap in risk-taking of female teams by their coach’s gender is the greater, the more experienced their head coach is.

Labour EconomicsVol. 94
Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT), Austrian Institute of Economic Research (AT), Ifo Institute for Economic Research (DE), IZA - Institute of Labor Economics (DE)
Oesterreichische Nationalbank
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sports Analytics and Performance
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.