Surgical Outcomes Following Instrumented Fusion in Low-Grade Spondylolisthesis: A 26-Month Retrospective Analysis

Background: Spondylolisthesis is characterized by the anterior or posterior displacement of a vertebra relative to the adjacent inferior vertebra. Patients with grade I-IV spondylolisthesis are initially treated by conservative measures, but surgical intervention becomes necessary for those with persistent symptoms. Surgical options range from pars repair in spondylosis to various fusion techniques, including instrumented reduction and fusion, or instrumented in situ fusion. The study aimed to evaluate the functional outcomes of surgical instrumentation in low-grade spondylolisthesis. Methods: This retrospective study included 30 patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis who underwent surgical instrumentation. Pain and functional outcomes were evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at baseline and follow-up intervals. Results: The baseline mean VAS score of 7.4 improved significantly at 6, 12, and 24 months (P < 0.01). The baseline mean ODI score of 66.8 also improved significantly at these intervals, with a final mean score of 12.51 at 24 months. Complications occurred in 3 patients, including neurological deficits and bone graft retropulsion. Conclusion: Surgical instrumentation leads to significant improvements in pain and function in patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis, offering excellent outcomes for those unresponsive to conservative treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopedic and Spine Trauma
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18502/jost.v11i1.18009
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surgical Outcomes Following Instrumented Fusion in Low-Grade Spondylolisthesis: A 26-Month Retrospective Analysis

Mahesh Shinde, Mihir R. Patel, Vinayak Bapat, Tushar V Ubale et al.
1 links
Journal of Orthopedic and Spine Trauma
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Surgical Outcomes Following Instrumented Fusion in Low-Grade Spondylolisthesis: A 26-Month Retrospective Analysis

Mahesh Shinde, Mihir R. Patel, Vinayak Bapat, Tushar V Ubale, Naman Khurana, M Dwivedi, Kshitij Sarwey, Atharva Sharma, Hindalahally Krishnegowda Karthik, Tej Bopardikar, Vinod Bhuktar, Sanket Jethliya
article en

Abstract

Background: Spondylolisthesis is characterized by the anterior or posterior displacement of a vertebra relative to the adjacent inferior vertebra. Patients with grade I-IV spondylolisthesis are initially treated by conservative measures, but surgical intervention becomes necessary for those with persistent symptoms. Surgical options range from pars repair in spondylosis to various fusion techniques, including instrumented reduction and fusion, or instrumented in situ fusion. The study aimed to evaluate the functional outcomes of surgical instrumentation in low-grade spondylolisthesis. Methods: This retrospective study included 30 patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis who underwent surgical instrumentation. Pain and functional outcomes were evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at baseline and follow-up intervals. Results: The baseline mean VAS score of 7.4 improved significantly at 6, 12, and 24 months (P < 0.01). The baseline mean ODI score of 66.8 also improved significantly at these intervals, with a final mean score of 12.51 at 24 months. Complications occurred in 3 patients, including neurological deficits and bone graft retropulsion. Conclusion: Surgical instrumentation leads to significant improvements in pain and function in patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis, offering excellent outcomes for those unresponsive to conservative treatment.

Journal of Orthopedic and Spine Trauma
Cooper Hospital (IN), Bhaktivedanta Hospital & Research Institute (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.