Sensitivities of weighting methods in the sustainability assessment of public transport in Latin American cities

• Few studies assess sensitivity in sustainability of Latin American transit systems. • Transit sustainability is compared with equal weighting (EWA) and expert preference. • Analytic Hierarchical Process and Budget Allocation Points are used for weighting. • Social and system effectiveness dimensions get higher weight in expert preferences. • Ranking positions of cities with more balanced performance are less sensitive. Several studies have been conducted on the sustainability performance of public transport (PT) systems, but few of these studies have focused on Latin American cities, which present a number of distinctive characteristics. These include the prevalence of harassment against women in PT vehicles, the use of outdated technology, and the lack of data availability. This study presents a sensitivity analysis for the Sustainable Public Transport Index for LATin AMerica (SPTI-LATAM) for 11 Latin American case study cities. Four weighting methods are applied at the levels of sustainability dimensions, categories and indicators, including the Equal Weighting Average (EWA), Analytic Hierarchical Processes (AHP), and Budget Allocation Points (BAP) approaches. Monte Carlo simulations are added to examine the robustness of the SPTI-LATAM city rankings for a large number of randomly drawn weights. Local stakeholder preferences in AHP and BAP, sensitivities in PT sustainability performance and ranking positions of the 11 cities are presented as the main results. The study’s findings reveal substantial differences between the stakeholder preferences and the EWA approach. The highest weights are assigned to the System Effectiveness and the Social dimensions. Ranking positions are stable for cities with the highest sustainability performance, whereas those with lower performance are show greater sensitivity, which is related to a less balanced scoring of single indicators. Recommendations are made for the further development of the SPTI-LATAM into a tool that measures the sustainability performance of PT systems in the Latin American context reliably across cities and over time, while also representing local stakeholders’ preferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101362
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivities of weighting methods in the sustainability assessment of public transport in Latin American cities

Regine Gerike, Alexandra Velasco
1 citations
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
2.42
article

Sensitivities of weighting methods in the sustainability assessment of public transport in Latin American cities

Regine Gerike, Alexandra Velasco
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Few studies assess sensitivity in sustainability of Latin American transit systems. • Transit sustainability is compared with equal weighting (EWA) and expert preference. • Analytic Hierarchical Process and Budget Allocation Points are used for weighting. • Social and system effectiveness dimensions get higher weight in expert preferences. • Ranking positions of cities with more balanced performance are less sensitive. Several studies have been conducted on the sustainability performance of public transport (PT) systems, but few of these studies have focused on Latin American cities, which present a number of distinctive characteristics. These include the prevalence of harassment against women in PT vehicles, the use of outdated technology, and the lack of data availability. This study presents a sensitivity analysis for the Sustainable Public Transport Index for LATin AMerica (SPTI-LATAM) for 11 Latin American case study cities. Four weighting methods are applied at the levels of sustainability dimensions, categories and indicators, including the Equal Weighting Average (EWA), Analytic Hierarchical Processes (AHP), and Budget Allocation Points (BAP) approaches. Monte Carlo simulations are added to examine the robustness of the SPTI-LATAM city rankings for a large number of randomly drawn weights. Local stakeholder preferences in AHP and BAP, sensitivities in PT sustainability performance and ranking positions of the 11 cities are presented as the main results. The study’s findings reveal substantial differences between the stakeholder preferences and the EWA approach. The highest weights are assigned to the System Effectiveness and the Social dimensions. Ranking positions are stable for cities with the highest sustainability performance, whereas those with lower performance are show greater sensitivity, which is related to a less balanced scoring of single indicators. Recommendations are made for the further development of the SPTI-LATAM into a tool that measures the sustainability performance of PT systems in the Latin American context reliably across cities and over time, while also representing local stakeholders’ preferences.

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesVol. 30
Fraunhofer Institute for Transportation and Infrastructure Systems (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.