Inhibiting Overoxidation of Dynamically Evolved RuO<sub>2</sub> to Achieve a Win–Win in Activity–Stability for Acidic Water Electrolysis
Proton exchange membrane (PEM) water electrolysis offers an efficient route to large-scale green hydrogen production, in which the RuO<sub>2</sub> catalyst exhibits superior activity but limited stability. Unveiling the atomic-scale structural evolution during operando reaction conditions is critical but remains a grand challenge for enhancing the durability of the RuO<sub>2</sub> catalyst in the acidic oxygen evolution reaction (a-OER). This study proposes an adaptive machine learning workflow to elucidate the potential-dependent state-to-state global evolution of the RuO<sub>2</sub>(110) surface within a complex composition and configuration space, revealing the correlation between structural patterns and stability. We identify the active state with distorted RuO<sub>5</sub> units that self-evolve at low potential, which exhibits minor Ru dissolution and an activity self-promotion phenomenon. However, this state exhibits a low potential resistance capacity (PRC) and evolves into inert RuO<sub>4</sub> units at elevated potential. To enhance PRC and mitigate the overevolution of the active state, we explore the metal doping engineering and uncover an inverse volcano-type doping rule: the doped metal-oxygen bond strength should significantly differ from the Ru-O bond. This rule provides a theoretical framework for designing stable RuO<sub>2</sub>-based catalysts and clarifies current discrepancies regarding the roles of different metals in stabilizing RuO<sub>2</sub>. Applying this rule, we predict and confirm experimentally that Na can effectively stabilize RuO<sub>2</sub> in its active state. The synthesized Na-RuO<sub>2</sub> operates in a-OER for over 1800 h without any degradation and enables long-term durability in PEM electrolysis. This work enhances our understanding of the operando structural evolution of RuO<sub>2</sub> and aids in designing durable catalysts for a-OER.
Authors
- Yu Hou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1691-7561)
- Haifeng Qi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9387-1195)
- Peng Fei Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0411-0488)
- Hao Yang Lin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8810-3327)
- Xiaopeng Fu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6056-7103)
- Zhenxin Lou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5587-3659)
- Dingming Chen
- Haifeng Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6138-5800)
- Wenjing Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2479-4055)
- Hua Gui Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0436-8622)
- Miaoyu Lin
- Haiyang Yuan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6175-391X)
Institutions
- East China University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Green Chemistry (PL)
- Cardiff University (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Published
- 2025-02-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c18300
- Citations
- 42
- Primary Topic
- Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 15.27
Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Shanghai Municipal Education Commission
- Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality
- National Key Research and Development Program of China
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities