The Prevalence and Pattern of Oral and Maxillofacial Injuries in Al Fujairah Population, UAE- A Retrospective Study

Background There is inadequate documentation of Maxillofacial Injuries prevalence and patterns of occurrence in the UAE. This study aimed to explore the prevalence and trends of maxillofacial injuries among patients at Al-Fujairah Hospital, UAE, focusing on gender distribution, affected age groups, common causes, injury locations, associated soft tissue damage, diagnostic methods, and treatment approaches. Methodology The retrospective study was conducted at Al Fujairah Hospital, UAE, between January 2003 and February 2015 and included 716 medical records of patients (59 males and 118 females) with maxillofacial injuries. The age range was from 3 to 64 years, with a mean (SD) age of 27(6.23) years. The data included demographic details, clinical findings, radiological findings, and intervention modalities. Descriptive statistics and the Chi-square test were used to study the prevalence and trends of maxillofacial injuries. Results The age group 21-40 was the most affected. The age group older than 60 years old was the least affected. Oral and maxillofacial injuries were more prevalent in urban regions (n=113 (82.5%)) cases compared to rural areas (n=24(17.5%)). The majority of the victims were students. Road traffic accidents were the predominant cause of oral and maxillofacial injuries (34.5%), followed by workplace accidents (28.2%), falls (25.2%), assaults (7.7%), and others (4.1%). Among the patients, 76.4% experienced mandible or midface fractures or both. Among these, the most sustained were mandibular fractures (46.8%), followed by zygomatic complex fractures (17.0%), and 12.7% sustained mid-facial fractures. Additional fracture locations comprise nasal (27%), orbital (16%), dentoalveolar (10%), and frontal bone (7%). Of the Mandibular fractures, condylar fractures were the most common (5.4%), followed by fractures of the angle (3.8%), body (3.3%), symphysis (1.6%), and parasymphysis (1.1%). The predominant soft tissue injury was laceration, followed by contusions and incised wounds. Regarding the radiological investigations, OPGs were most commonly used for diagnosing mandibular fractures. In contrast, CT scans were commonly used to diagnose midfacial injuries, and the differences were statistically significant ( p <0.05). Conclusion The study underscores the need for targeted preventive strategies for maxillofacial injuries, primarily caused by road traffic accidents in Al-Fujairah.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Open Dentistry Journal
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2174/0118742106362439250206044222
Primary Topic
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Prevalence and Pattern of Oral and Maxillofacial Injuries in Al Fujairah Population, UAE- A Retrospective Study

Deepavalli Arumuganainar, Sara Abdulla, Mohamed Jaber, Pradeep Kumar Yadalam et al.
The Open Dentistry Journal
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
article

The Prevalence and Pattern of Oral and Maxillofacial Injuries in Al Fujairah Population, UAE- A Retrospective Study

Deepavalli Arumuganainar, Sara Abdulla, Mohamed Jaber, Pradeep Kumar Yadalam, Asok Mathew, Alia Saeed, S. Al Kaabi, Asmaa Al-Hmoudi
article en

Abstract

Background There is inadequate documentation of Maxillofacial Injuries prevalence and patterns of occurrence in the UAE. This study aimed to explore the prevalence and trends of maxillofacial injuries among patients at Al-Fujairah Hospital, UAE, focusing on gender distribution, affected age groups, common causes, injury locations, associated soft tissue damage, diagnostic methods, and treatment approaches. Methodology The retrospective study was conducted at Al Fujairah Hospital, UAE, between January 2003 and February 2015 and included 716 medical records of patients (59 males and 118 females) with maxillofacial injuries. The age range was from 3 to 64 years, with a mean (SD) age of 27(6.23) years. The data included demographic details, clinical findings, radiological findings, and intervention modalities. Descriptive statistics and the Chi-square test were used to study the prevalence and trends of maxillofacial injuries. Results The age group 21-40 was the most affected. The age group older than 60 years old was the least affected. Oral and maxillofacial injuries were more prevalent in urban regions (n=113 (82.5%)) cases compared to rural areas (n=24(17.5%)). The majority of the victims were students. Road traffic accidents were the predominant cause of oral and maxillofacial injuries (34.5%), followed by workplace accidents (28.2%), falls (25.2%), assaults (7.7%), and others (4.1%). Among the patients, 76.4% experienced mandible or midface fractures or both. Among these, the most sustained were mandibular fractures (46.8%), followed by zygomatic complex fractures (17.0%), and 12.7% sustained mid-facial fractures. Additional fracture locations comprise nasal (27%), orbital (16%), dentoalveolar (10%), and frontal bone (7%). Of the Mandibular fractures, condylar fractures were the most common (5.4%), followed by fractures of the angle (3.8%), body (3.3%), symphysis (1.6%), and parasymphysis (1.1%). The predominant soft tissue injury was laceration, followed by contusions and incised wounds. Regarding the radiological investigations, OPGs were most commonly used for diagnosing mandibular fractures. In contrast, CT scans were commonly used to diagnose midfacial injuries, and the differences were statistically significant ( p <0.05). Conclusion The study underscores the need for targeted preventive strategies for maxillofacial injuries, primarily caused by road traffic accidents in Al-Fujairah.

The Open Dentistry JournalVol. 19(1)
Ajman University (AE), Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (AE), Ministry of Health (AE), Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.