Mortality Outcome Associated with Specific KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF Hot-Spot Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

<b>Background/Objective:</b> The prognostic value of specific hot-spot mutations within <i>KRAS</i>, <i>NRAS</i>, and <i>BRAF</i> genes in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) genes remains debatable. This study explores whether certain <i>KRAS</i>, <i>NRAS</i>, and <i>BRAF</i> mutations are associated with the risk of all-cause mortality in mCRC. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively analyzed records of 494 patients with mCRC treated at the University of Texas Medical Branch between January 2016 and July 2023. Data on genetic mutations and clinicopathological features were collected for this analysis. We estimated survival probabilities and conducted multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate the impact of specific mutations on all-cause mortality risk. <b>Results:</b><i>KRAS</i> c.35G>T (p.Gly12Val) and c.34G>T (p.Gly12Cys) mutations were significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in the overall mCRC population and the treated mCRC subgroup. <i>KRAS</i> c.38G>A (p.Gly13Asp) was significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in the treated mCRC subgroup but <i>BRAF</i> c.1799T>A (p.Val600Glu) was significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in the overall mCRC population. No significant association was observed between <i>NRAS</i> mutations and mortality risk in mCRC, possibly due to their lower frequency or different biological effects compared to <i>KRAS</i> and <i>BRAF</i> mutations. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings suggest that specific <i>KRAS</i> [c.35G>T (p.Gly12Val), c.34G>T (p.Gly12Cys), and c.38G>A (p.Gly13Asp)] and <i>BRAF</i> c.1799T>A (p.Val600Glu) mutations may have prognostic value in mCRC. However, given the single-center study design and lack of direct therapeutic implications, larger multicenter studies are needed to substantiate these results and better define the clinical relevance of these mutations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15050590
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mortality Outcome Associated with Specific KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF Hot-Spot Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Anthony O. Okorodudu, Jianli Dong, Yu‐Wei Cheng, Yong‐Fang Kuo et al.
3 citations
Diagnostics
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
3.14
article

Mortality Outcome Associated with Specific KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF Hot-Spot Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Anthony O. Okorodudu, Jianli Dong, Yu‐Wei Cheng, Yong‐Fang Kuo, Omer Abdelgadir, M. Firoze Khan
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objective:</b> The prognostic value of specific hot-spot mutations within <i>KRAS</i>, <i>NRAS</i>, and <i>BRAF</i> genes in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) genes remains debatable. This study explores whether certain <i>KRAS</i>, <i>NRAS</i>, and <i>BRAF</i> mutations are associated with the risk of all-cause mortality in mCRC. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively analyzed records of 494 patients with mCRC treated at the University of Texas Medical Branch between January 2016 and July 2023. Data on genetic mutations and clinicopathological features were collected for this analysis. We estimated survival probabilities and conducted multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate the impact of specific mutations on all-cause mortality risk. <b>Results:</b><i>KRAS</i> c.35G>T (p.Gly12Val) and c.34G>T (p.Gly12Cys) mutations were significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in the overall mCRC population and the treated mCRC subgroup. <i>KRAS</i> c.38G>A (p.Gly13Asp) was significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in the treated mCRC subgroup but <i>BRAF</i> c.1799T>A (p.Val600Glu) was significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in the overall mCRC population. No significant association was observed between <i>NRAS</i> mutations and mortality risk in mCRC, possibly due to their lower frequency or different biological effects compared to <i>KRAS</i> and <i>BRAF</i> mutations. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings suggest that specific <i>KRAS</i> [c.35G>T (p.Gly12Val), c.34G>T (p.Gly12Cys), and c.38G>A (p.Gly13Asp)] and <i>BRAF</i> c.1799T>A (p.Val600Glu) mutations may have prognostic value in mCRC. However, given the single-center study design and lack of direct therapeutic implications, larger multicenter studies are needed to substantiate these results and better define the clinical relevance of these mutations.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(5)
Cleveland Clinic (US), The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
3.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.