How Do Climate and Latitude Shape Global Tree Canopy Structure?

Understanding global patterns of tree canopy height and density is essential for effective forest management and conservation planning. This study examines how these attributes vary along latitudinal gradients and identifies key climatic drivers influencing them. We utilized high-resolution remote sensing datasets, including a 10 m resolution canopy height dataset aggregated to 1 km for computational efficiency, and a 1 km resolution tree density dataset derived from ground-based measurements. To quantify the relationships between forest structure and environmental factors, we applied nonlinear regression models and climate dependency analyses, incorporating bioclimatic variables from the WorldClim dataset. Our key finding is that latitude exerts a dominant but asymmetric control on tree height and density, with tropical regions exhibiting the strongest correlations. Tree height follows a quadratic latitudinal pattern, explaining 29.3% of global variation, but this relationship is most pronounced in the tropics (−10° to 10° latitude, R2 = 91.3%), where warm and humid conditions promote taller forests. Importantly, this effect differs by hemisphere, with the Southern Hemisphere (R2 = 67.1%) showing stronger latitudinal dependence than the Northern Hemisphere (R2 = 35.3%), indicating climatic asymmetry in forest growth dynamics. Tree density exhibits a similar quadratic trend but with weaker global predictive power (R2 = 7%); however, within the tropics, latitude explains 90.6% of tree density variation, underscoring strong environmental constraints in biodiverse ecosystems. Among climatic factors, isothermality (Bio 3) is identified as the strongest determinant of tree height (R2 = 50.8%), suggesting that regions with stable temperature fluctuations foster taller forests. Tree density is most strongly influenced by the mean diurnal temperature range (Bio 2, R2 = 36.3%), emphasizing the role of daily thermal variability in tree distribution. Precipitation-related factors (Bio 14 and Bio 19) moderately explain tree height (~33%) and tree density (~25%), reinforcing the role of moisture availability in structuring forests. This study advances forest ecology research by integrating high-resolution canopy structure data with robust climate-driven modeling, revealing previously undocumented hemispheric asymmetries and biome-specific climate dependencies. These findings improve global forest predictive models and offer new insights for conservation strategies, particularly in tropical regions vulnerable to climate change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forests
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/f16030432
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Do Climate and Latitude Shape Global Tree Canopy Structure?

Chuleui Jung, Pinliang Dong, Ehsan Rahimi
2 citations
Forests
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
2.21
article

How Do Climate and Latitude Shape Global Tree Canopy Structure?

Chuleui Jung, Pinliang Dong, Ehsan Rahimi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Understanding global patterns of tree canopy height and density is essential for effective forest management and conservation planning. This study examines how these attributes vary along latitudinal gradients and identifies key climatic drivers influencing them. We utilized high-resolution remote sensing datasets, including a 10 m resolution canopy height dataset aggregated to 1 km for computational efficiency, and a 1 km resolution tree density dataset derived from ground-based measurements. To quantify the relationships between forest structure and environmental factors, we applied nonlinear regression models and climate dependency analyses, incorporating bioclimatic variables from the WorldClim dataset. Our key finding is that latitude exerts a dominant but asymmetric control on tree height and density, with tropical regions exhibiting the strongest correlations. Tree height follows a quadratic latitudinal pattern, explaining 29.3% of global variation, but this relationship is most pronounced in the tropics (−10° to 10° latitude, R2 = 91.3%), where warm and humid conditions promote taller forests. Importantly, this effect differs by hemisphere, with the Southern Hemisphere (R2 = 67.1%) showing stronger latitudinal dependence than the Northern Hemisphere (R2 = 35.3%), indicating climatic asymmetry in forest growth dynamics. Tree density exhibits a similar quadratic trend but with weaker global predictive power (R2 = 7%); however, within the tropics, latitude explains 90.6% of tree density variation, underscoring strong environmental constraints in biodiverse ecosystems. Among climatic factors, isothermality (Bio 3) is identified as the strongest determinant of tree height (R2 = 50.8%), suggesting that regions with stable temperature fluctuations foster taller forests. Tree density is most strongly influenced by the mean diurnal temperature range (Bio 2, R2 = 36.3%), emphasizing the role of daily thermal variability in tree distribution. Precipitation-related factors (Bio 14 and Bio 19) moderately explain tree height (~33%) and tree density (~25%), reinforcing the role of moisture availability in structuring forests. This study advances forest ecology research by integrating high-resolution canopy structure data with robust climate-driven modeling, revealing previously undocumented hemispheric asymmetries and biome-specific climate dependencies. These findings improve global forest predictive models and offer new insights for conservation strategies, particularly in tropical regions vulnerable to climate change.

ForestsVol. 16(3)
Gyeongguk National University (KR), University of North Texas (US)
Rural Development Administration, National Research Foundation of Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.