Assessing non-inferiority for binary matched-pairs data with missing values: a powerful and flexible GEE approach based on the risk difference

Our results indicate that the proposed GEE approach is a powerful alternative to existing methods and can be used for testing non-inferiority, even if the initial sample size calculation was based on a different statistical method. Furthermore, it increases the analytical flexibility by allowing the inclusion of additional covariates, in contrast to other methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02497-2
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing non-inferiority for binary matched-pairs data with missing values: a powerful and flexible GEE approach based on the risk difference

Frank Konietschke, Annette Aigner, Juliane Herm, Johannes Hengelbrock et al.
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
article

Assessing non-inferiority for binary matched-pairs data with missing values: a powerful and flexible GEE approach based on the risk difference

Frank Konietschke, Annette Aigner, Juliane Herm, Johannes Hengelbrock, Heinrich J. Audebert
article en

Abstract

Our results indicate that the proposed GEE approach is a powerful alternative to existing methods and can be used for testing non-inferiority, even if the initial sample size calculation was based on a different statistical method. Furthermore, it increases the analytical flexibility by allowing the inclusion of additional covariates, in contrast to other methods.

BMC Medical Research MethodologyVol. 25(1)
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Martin-Luther-Krankenhaus (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Einstein Stiftung Berlin
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.