Bugs in the system: the logic of insect farming research is flawed by unfounded assumptions

Abstract Insect farming is frequently proposed as an emerging industry that can improve the environmental and economic sustainability of the food system. However, existing research often overlooks significant challenges. In this article, we identify three bugs in the scientific literature on insect farming: (1) the overreliance on a handful of old studies when discussing environmental impacts; (2) the pervasive assumption that insect farms will utilise food waste; and (3) the reliance on theoretical price projections that do not hold up under commercial conditions. We then discuss how promising technologies, despite their theoretical benefits, often encounter social and material challenges in practice. Debugging the literature will involve producing more realistic life-cycle assessments, which will provide policymakers and industry with the data needed to make informed decisions for a truly sustainable food system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Sustainable Agriculture
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44264-024-00042-0
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Insect Utilization and Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bugs in the system: the logic of insect farming research is flawed by unfounded assumptions

Dustin Crummett, Michael St. Jules, Ren Ryba, Corentin Biteau et al.
8 citations
npj Sustainable Agriculture
Insect Utilization and Effects
13.38
article

Bugs in the system: the logic of insect farming research is flawed by unfounded assumptions

Dustin Crummett, Michael St. Jules, Ren Ryba, Corentin Biteau, Tom Bry‐Chevalier
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Insect farming is frequently proposed as an emerging industry that can improve the environmental and economic sustainability of the food system. However, existing research often overlooks significant challenges. In this article, we identify three bugs in the scientific literature on insect farming: (1) the overreliance on a handful of old studies when discussing environmental impacts; (2) the pervasive assumption that insect farms will utilise food waste; and (3) the reliance on theoretical price projections that do not hold up under commercial conditions. We then discuss how promising technologies, despite their theoretical benefits, often encounter social and material challenges in practice. Debugging the literature will involve producing more realistic life-cycle assessments, which will provide policymakers and industry with the data needed to make informed decisions for a truly sustainable food system.

npj Sustainable AgricultureVol. 3(1)
AgroParisTech (FR), York College of Pennsylvania (US), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), University of Washington Tacoma (US), Hôpital Broussais (FR), Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée (FR), Network Rail (GB), Université de Lorraine (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Insect Utilization and Effects
13.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.