Advancing just transition: The role of biomass co-firing in emission reductions and employment for coal regions

As efforts to mitigate carbon emissions intensify, the issue of justice in the transition process has gained significant attention. The environmental impacts of low-carbon technologies, such as renewable energy, have been widely evaluated. This study develops an integrated model to quantify the employment effects of biomass co-firing retrofitting for coal plants and to explore its optimal ratio. We also modified a plant-level carbon emission calculation method to analyze the trade-off between carbon emissions and social benefits. Our results indicate that when the blend rate of coal and biomass exceeds 90%, there are noticeable changes in job creation. However, the maximum job creation value is negative, suggesting that biomass co-firing technology is not an effective choice for achieving a just transition during the large-scale coal phase-out process, and it is less competitive compared to renewable energy. Additionally, we find that generation efficiency is linearly negatively correlated with the blend rate. Moreover, carbon emission intensity and job intensity are positively correlated linearly, while there is a nonlinear negative correlation between job intensity and the blend ratio. Overall, biomass co-firing appears insufficient for a just transition in coal phase-out, indicating a need for regionally adaptive blend ratios for optimal operation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2025.104246
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing just transition: The role of biomass co-firing in emission reductions and employment for coal regions

Yating Deng, Zenghui Liu, Xuelin Tian, Weiyao Yang et al.
5 citations
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
21.01
article

Advancing just transition: The role of biomass co-firing in emission reductions and employment for coal regions

Yating Deng, Zenghui Liu, Xuelin Tian, Weiyao Yang, Yu Zhao, Mingyu Zhai
article en
5 citations

Abstract

As efforts to mitigate carbon emissions intensify, the issue of justice in the transition process has gained significant attention. The environmental impacts of low-carbon technologies, such as renewable energy, have been widely evaluated. This study develops an integrated model to quantify the employment effects of biomass co-firing retrofitting for coal plants and to explore its optimal ratio. We also modified a plant-level carbon emission calculation method to analyze the trade-off between carbon emissions and social benefits. Our results indicate that when the blend rate of coal and biomass exceeds 90%, there are noticeable changes in job creation. However, the maximum job creation value is negative, suggesting that biomass co-firing technology is not an effective choice for achieving a just transition during the large-scale coal phase-out process, and it is less competitive compared to renewable energy. Additionally, we find that generation efficiency is linearly negatively correlated with the blend rate. Moreover, carbon emission intensity and job intensity are positively correlated linearly, while there is a nonlinear negative correlation between job intensity and the blend ratio. Overall, biomass co-firing appears insufficient for a just transition in coal phase-out, indicating a need for regionally adaptive blend ratios for optimal operation.

Sustainable Energy Technologies and AssessmentsVol. 75
Australian National University (AU), Tianjin University (CN), ShanghaiTech University (CN), Keio University Shonan Fujisawa (JP), Concordia University (CA), Temple University (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
21.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.