Landscape features in single-objective continuous optimization: Have we hit a wall in algorithm selection generalization?

The process of identifying the most suitable optimization algorithm for a specific problem, referred to as algorithm selection (AS), entails training models that leverage problem landscape features to forecast algorithm performance. A significant challenge in this domain is ensuring that AS models can generalize effectively to novel, unseen problems. This study evaluates the generalizability of AS models based on different problem representations in the context of single-objective continuous optimization. In particular, it considers the most widely used Exploratory Landscape Analysis features, as well as recently proposed Topological Landscape Analysis features, and features based on deep learning, such as DeepELA, TransOptAS and Doe2Vec. Our results indicate that when presented with out-of-distribution evaluation data, none of the feature-based AS models outperform a simple baseline model, i.e., a Single Best Solver. • Benchmarking single-objective numerical optimization problem landscape features. • Investigating whether problem landscape features capture algorithm performance. • Analyzing problem landscape feature similarity and complementarity. • Evaluating Algorithm Selection generalizability with different feature groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Swarm and Evolutionary Computation
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2025.101894
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Landscape features in single-objective continuous optimization: Have we hit a wall in algorithm selection generalization?

Gašper Petelin, Moritz Vinzent Seiler, Gjorgjina Cenikj, Tome Eftimov et al.
5 citations
Swarm and Evolutionary Computation
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
7.52
article

Landscape features in single-objective continuous optimization: Have we hit a wall in algorithm selection generalization?

Gašper Petelin, Moritz Vinzent Seiler, Gjorgjina Cenikj, Tome Eftimov, Nikola Cenikj
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The process of identifying the most suitable optimization algorithm for a specific problem, referred to as algorithm selection (AS), entails training models that leverage problem landscape features to forecast algorithm performance. A significant challenge in this domain is ensuring that AS models can generalize effectively to novel, unseen problems. This study evaluates the generalizability of AS models based on different problem representations in the context of single-objective continuous optimization. In particular, it considers the most widely used Exploratory Landscape Analysis features, as well as recently proposed Topological Landscape Analysis features, and features based on deep learning, such as DeepELA, TransOptAS and Doe2Vec. Our results indicate that when presented with out-of-distribution evaluation data, none of the feature-based AS models outperform a simple baseline model, i.e., a Single Best Solver. • Benchmarking single-objective numerical optimization problem landscape features. • Investigating whether problem landscape features capture algorithm performance. • Analyzing problem landscape feature similarity and complementarity. • Evaluating Algorithm Selection generalizability with different feature groups.

Swarm and Evolutionary ComputationVol. 94
Paderborn University (DE), Jožef Stefan Institute (SI), Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School (SI), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
7.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.