Observing phubbing behaviors during casual and serious conversations: consequences for conversation quality, connectedness, and appropriateness

The present study investigated observers' perspectives of smartphone use during social interactions in serious and casual conversational contexts, suggesting gender differences. The results of the between-subjects 2 × 2 experimental study show that female observers perceive lower conversation quality when observing phubbing than male observers, aligning with the need-threat model's assertion of female susceptibility to social exclusion. Moreover, observing phubbing diminishes perceived appropriateness of the interaction. Interestingly, no disparity was found in casual versus serious topics of the conversations. Societal implications are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02426-4
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
30.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Observing phubbing behaviors during casual and serious conversations: consequences for conversation quality, connectedness, and appropriateness

Anja Stević, Jörg Matthes, Hanna Liftinger
2 citations
BMC Psychology
Media Influence and Health
30.35
article

Observing phubbing behaviors during casual and serious conversations: consequences for conversation quality, connectedness, and appropriateness

Anja Stević, Jörg Matthes, Hanna Liftinger
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The present study investigated observers' perspectives of smartphone use during social interactions in serious and casual conversational contexts, suggesting gender differences. The results of the between-subjects 2 × 2 experimental study show that female observers perceive lower conversation quality when observing phubbing than male observers, aligning with the need-threat model's assertion of female susceptibility to social exclusion. Moreover, observing phubbing diminishes perceived appropriateness of the interaction. Interestingly, no disparity was found in casual versus serious topics of the conversations. Societal implications are discussed.

BMC PsychologyVol. 13(1)
University of Vienna (AT), Stanford Medicine (US), Stanford University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Media Influence and Health
30.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.