Calibrating Noise for Group Privacy in Subsampled Mechanisms
Given a group size m and a sensitive dataset D , group privacy (GP) releases information about D (e.g., weights of a neural network trained on D) with the guarantee that the adversary cannot infer with high confidence whether the underlying data is D or a neighboring dataset D ′ that differs from D by m records. GP generalizes the well-established notion of differential privacy (DP) for protecting individuals' privacy; in particular, when m = 1, GP reduces to DP. Compared to DP, GP is capable of protecting the sensitive aggregate information of a group of up to m individuals, e.g., the average annual income among members of a yacht club. Despite its longstanding presence in the research literature and its promising applications, GP is often treated as an afterthought, with most approaches first developing a differential privacy (DP) mechanism and then using a generic conversion to adapt it for GP, treating the DP solution as a black box. As we point out in the paper, this methodology is suboptimal when the underlying DP solution involves subsampling, e.g., in the classic DP-SGD method for training deep learning models. In this case, the DP-to-GP conversion is overly pessimistic in its analysis, leading to high error and low utility in the published results under GP. Motivated by this, we propose a novel analysis framework that provides tight privacy accounting for subsampled GP mechanisms. Instead of converting a black-box DP mechanism to GP, our solution carefully analyzes and utilizes the inherent randomness in subsampled mechanisms, leading to a substantially improved bound on the privacy loss with respect to GP. The proposed solution applies to a wide variety of foundational mechanisms with subsampling. Extensive experiments with real datasets demonstrate that compared to the baseline convert-from-blackbox-DP approach, our GP mechanisms achieve noise reductions of over an order of magnitude in several practical settings, including deep neural network training.
Authors
- Xiaokui Xiao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0914-4580)
- Yin Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0549-3882)
- Xinjian Luo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9671-5104)
- Yangfan Jiang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4010-9831)
Institutions
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
- Published
- 2024-10-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.14778/3705829.3705848
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.69