Stakeholder engagement in regulatory policymaking in a neo-corporatist setting: assessing diversity and balance in open consultations

Abstract It has been argued that engaging a wide range of stakeholders in regulatory policymaking could enhance its legitimacy, quality, and acceptability. Open consultations are the only venue that theoretically allows the participation of those affected by policy proposals or those with a special position in relation to them. We examine the participation of all stakeholder types in open consultations, including organized and non-organized interests, across policy areas and time in Finland, a country with a neo-corporatist background. Our novel dataset consists of over 16,000 written statements submitted in nearly 500 open consultations over three years (2013, 2017, and 2021). We study the level of diversity among stakeholder types using the Herfindahl–Hirschman index while also discussing the balance of their participation in relation to the policy areas in which their engagement occurs. Our findings reveal that organized interests are particularly active compared to non-organized actors, although we note some increase in the engagement of companies over the years. The overall level of stakeholder diversity reflects moderate concentration, but it varies considerably across policy areas. We suggest that occasional high concentration in engagement does not necessarily indicate imbalance, as the policy issue itself determines whose involvement is most relevant.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interest Groups & Advocacy
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41309-025-00233-1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stakeholder engagement in regulatory policymaking in a neo-corporatist setting: assessing diversity and balance in open consultations

Noora Kristiina Alasuutari, Kati Rantala
2 citations
Interest Groups & Advocacy
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
4.45
article

Stakeholder engagement in regulatory policymaking in a neo-corporatist setting: assessing diversity and balance in open consultations

Noora Kristiina Alasuutari, Kati Rantala
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract It has been argued that engaging a wide range of stakeholders in regulatory policymaking could enhance its legitimacy, quality, and acceptability. Open consultations are the only venue that theoretically allows the participation of those affected by policy proposals or those with a special position in relation to them. We examine the participation of all stakeholder types in open consultations, including organized and non-organized interests, across policy areas and time in Finland, a country with a neo-corporatist background. Our novel dataset consists of over 16,000 written statements submitted in nearly 500 open consultations over three years (2013, 2017, and 2021). We study the level of diversity among stakeholder types using the Herfindahl–Hirschman index while also discussing the balance of their participation in relation to the policy areas in which their engagement occurs. Our findings reveal that organized interests are particularly active compared to non-organized actors, although we note some increase in the engagement of companies over the years. The overall level of stakeholder diversity reflects moderate concentration, but it varies considerably across policy areas. We suggest that occasional high concentration in engagement does not necessarily indicate imbalance, as the policy issue itself determines whose involvement is most relevant.

Interest Groups & AdvocacyVol. 14(2)
University of Helsinki (FI)
Helsingin Yliopisto, Strategic Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
4.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.