3D quantification of metal-induced geometric distortions in MRI

The increasing number of patients with metal implants raises concerns about metal-induced geometric distortions (MD) in MR-guided treatments. This study proposes a method for three-dimensional quantification of MD and evaluates its accuracy and reliability. A 3D lattice phantom was designed and measured with two sequences (VIBE and SPACE) and two implants (crown-supported-dental-implant and stainless-steel-bracket). Automated detection of displacement of 9360 crossing points caused by MD was performed. Distortion-quantification accuracy was improved by correcting for noise-induced error (NE), related to different signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), and implant-related signal loss and pile-up artifact volumes (SLPUA). The method's accuracy was validated against computed tomography. Results showed high reliability, with an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (≥ 0.99) and low mean residual errors in all directions (2.6%/1.6%/1.8% of voxel size in X/Y/Z direction). SNR/SLPUA volumes were significant confounders (p-value ≤ 0.001) when comparing different sequences/implants, but corrections significantly reduced their impacts (p-value ≤ 0.001). This method enables accurate 3D MD quantification and fair comparison across different sequences/implants. By optimizing MRI protocols for MD minimization and defining implant-specific MD profiles for patient data correction, it may help improve spatial accuracy in MRI-guided treatments in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90645-5
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3D quantification of metal-induced geometric distortions in MRI

Jessica Jesser, Tim Hilgenfeld, Dominik F. Vollherbst, Martin Bendszus et al.
5 citations
Scientific Reports
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
3.37
article

3D quantification of metal-induced geometric distortions in MRI

Jessica Jesser, Tim Hilgenfeld, Dominik F. Vollherbst, Martin Bendszus, Michael O. Breckwoldt, Dániel Schwarz, Alexander Juerchott, Ali Çağlar Özen, Hao Li, Sabine Heiland
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The increasing number of patients with metal implants raises concerns about metal-induced geometric distortions (MD) in MR-guided treatments. This study proposes a method for three-dimensional quantification of MD and evaluates its accuracy and reliability. A 3D lattice phantom was designed and measured with two sequences (VIBE and SPACE) and two implants (crown-supported-dental-implant and stainless-steel-bracket). Automated detection of displacement of 9360 crossing points caused by MD was performed. Distortion-quantification accuracy was improved by correcting for noise-induced error (NE), related to different signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), and implant-related signal loss and pile-up artifact volumes (SLPUA). The method's accuracy was validated against computed tomography. Results showed high reliability, with an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (≥ 0.99) and low mean residual errors in all directions (2.6%/1.6%/1.8% of voxel size in X/Y/Z direction). SNR/SLPUA volumes were significant confounders (p-value ≤ 0.001) when comparing different sequences/implants, but corrections significantly reduced their impacts (p-value ≤ 0.001). This method enables accurate 3D MD quantification and fair comparison across different sequences/implants. By optimizing MRI protocols for MD minimization and defining implant-specific MD profiles for patient data correction, it may help improve spatial accuracy in MRI-guided treatments in the future.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Freiburg (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
3.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.