Estimating impact with surveys versus digital traces: Evidence from randomized cash transfers in Togo
We study whether program impacts can be estimated using a combination of digital trace data and machine learning. In a randomized controlled trial of cash transfers in Togo, endline survey data indicate positive treatment effects on food security, mental health, and perceived economic status. However, estimates of impact based solely on predicted endline outcomes (generated using trace data and machine learning, which do successfully predict baseline poverty) are generally not statistically significant. When post-treatment outcome data are used in conjunction with predictions to estimate treatment effects, predicted impacts are similar to those estimated using surveys. • Machine learning predicts • Yet surveys reveal the truth • Cash transfers’ true worth
Authors
- Emily Aiken (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4374-3536)
- Joshua Blumenstock (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1813-7414)
- Christopher Udry (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1605-1916)
- Dean Karlan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0164-1398)
- Suzanne Bellue (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5776-5288)
Institutions
- Northwestern University (US)
- ENSAE Paris (FR)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Development Economics
- Published
- 2025-02-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2025.103477
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 7.10
Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Microsoft Research
- Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft