Estimating impact with surveys versus digital traces: Evidence from randomized cash transfers in Togo

We study whether program impacts can be estimated using a combination of digital trace data and machine learning. In a randomized controlled trial of cash transfers in Togo, endline survey data indicate positive treatment effects on food security, mental health, and perceived economic status. However, estimates of impact based solely on predicted endline outcomes (generated using trace data and machine learning, which do successfully predict baseline poverty) are generally not statistically significant. When post-treatment outcome data are used in conjunction with predictions to estimate treatment effects, predicted impacts are similar to those estimated using surveys. • Machine learning predicts • Yet surveys reveal the truth • Cash transfers’ true worth

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Development Economics
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2025.103477
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating impact with surveys versus digital traces: Evidence from randomized cash transfers in Togo

Emily Aiken, Joshua Blumenstock, Christopher Udry, Dean Karlan et al.
3 citations
Journal of Development Economics
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
7.10
article

Estimating impact with surveys versus digital traces: Evidence from randomized cash transfers in Togo

Emily Aiken, Joshua Blumenstock, Christopher Udry, Dean Karlan, Suzanne Bellue
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We study whether program impacts can be estimated using a combination of digital trace data and machine learning. In a randomized controlled trial of cash transfers in Togo, endline survey data indicate positive treatment effects on food security, mental health, and perceived economic status. However, estimates of impact based solely on predicted endline outcomes (generated using trace data and machine learning, which do successfully predict baseline poverty) are generally not statistically significant. When post-treatment outcome data are used in conjunction with predictions to estimate treatment effects, predicted impacts are similar to those estimated using surveys. • Machine learning predicts • Yet surveys reveal the truth • Cash transfers’ true worth

Journal of Development EconomicsVol. 175
Northwestern University (US), ENSAE Paris (FR), University of California, Berkeley (US)
National Science Foundation, Microsoft Research, Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
7.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Estimating impact with surveys versus digital traces: Evidence from randomized cash transfers in Togo — Emily Aiken, Joshua Blumenstock, et al. · Journal of Development Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS