Usage-Based Models Around and Inside BLC Theory: Commentary on Hulstijn (2024)
In his essay entitled “Predictions of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Native and Non-Native Languages: An Update of BLC Theory”, Jan Hulstijn updates his theory of Basic Language Cognition (Hulstijn 2011, 2015). His central claim is that there is a fundamental difference between the Basic Language Cognition that is sufficient for dealing with oral language and the Extended Language Cognition required for handling reading and writing. In my invited commentary, I argue that used-based models of language provide a wider theoretical background that helps to ground Hulstijn’s theory. I illustrate what this means with reference to the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model (Schmid 2020). Based on this model I discuss Hulstijn’s predictions regarding the extent of interindividual differences to be expected among L1-speakers and L-2 speakers.
Authors
- Hansjörg Schmid (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3170-5244)
Institutions
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Languages
- Published
- 2025-02-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10030045
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Multilingual Education and Policy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 6.13