Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots’ Ability to Interpret Mammography Images: A Comparison of Chat-GPT 4o and Claude 3.5

Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the ability of artificial intelligence-based chatbots, ChatGPT-4o and Claude 3.5, to interpret mammography images. The study focuses on evaluating their accuracy and consistency in BI-RADS classification and breast parenchymal type assessment. It also aims to explore the potential of these technologies to reduce radiologists’ workload and identify their limitations in medical image analysis. Methods: A total of 53 mammography images obtained between January and July 2024 were analyzed, focusing on BI-RADS classification and breast parenchymal type assessment. The same anonymized mammography images were provided to both chatbots under identical prompts. Results: The results showed accuracy rates for BI-RADS classification ranging from 18.87% to 26.42% for ChatGPT-4o and 18.7% for Claude 3.5. When BI-RADS categories were grouped into benign group(BI-RADS 1,2) and malignant group(BI-RADS 4,5), the combined accuracy was 57.5% for ChatGPT-4o (initial evaluation) and 55% (second evaluation), compared to 47.5% for Claude 3.5. Breast parenchymal type accuracy rates were 30.19% and 22.64% for ChatGPT-4o, and 26.42% for Claude 3.5. Conclusions: The findings indicate that chatbots demonstrate limited accuracy and reliability in interpreting mammography images. These results highlight the need for further optimization, larger datasets, and advanced training processes to improve their performance in medical image analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Therapeutics
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther2599
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots’ Ability to Interpret Mammography Images: A Comparison of Chat-GPT 4o and Claude 3.5

Emre Emekli, Betül Nalan Karahan, Mahmut Altuğ Altın
4 citations
European Journal of Therapeutics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
2.62
article

Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots’ Ability to Interpret Mammography Images: A Comparison of Chat-GPT 4o and Claude 3.5

Emre Emekli, Betül Nalan Karahan, Mahmut Altuğ Altın
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the ability of artificial intelligence-based chatbots, ChatGPT-4o and Claude 3.5, to interpret mammography images. The study focuses on evaluating their accuracy and consistency in BI-RADS classification and breast parenchymal type assessment. It also aims to explore the potential of these technologies to reduce radiologists’ workload and identify their limitations in medical image analysis. Methods: A total of 53 mammography images obtained between January and July 2024 were analyzed, focusing on BI-RADS classification and breast parenchymal type assessment. The same anonymized mammography images were provided to both chatbots under identical prompts. Results: The results showed accuracy rates for BI-RADS classification ranging from 18.87% to 26.42% for ChatGPT-4o and 18.7% for Claude 3.5. When BI-RADS categories were grouped into benign group(BI-RADS 1,2) and malignant group(BI-RADS 4,5), the combined accuracy was 57.5% for ChatGPT-4o (initial evaluation) and 55% (second evaluation), compared to 47.5% for Claude 3.5. Breast parenchymal type accuracy rates were 30.19% and 22.64% for ChatGPT-4o, and 26.42% for Claude 3.5. Conclusions: The findings indicate that chatbots demonstrate limited accuracy and reliability in interpreting mammography images. These results highlight the need for further optimization, larger datasets, and advanced training processes to improve their performance in medical image analysis.

European Journal of TherapeuticsVol. 31(1)
Eskişehir Osmangazi University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
2.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots’ Ability to Interpret Mammography Images: A Comparison of Chat-GPT 4o and Claude 3.5 — Emre Emekli, Betül Nalan Karahan, et al. · European Journal of Therapeutics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS