From Metabolic Syndrome to Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome in the SIMETAP Study: Prevalence Rates of Metabolic Syndrome and Its Independent Associations with Cardio-Renal-Metabolic Disorders Other than Its Defining Criteria

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a highly prevalent entity defined according to cardiometabolic criteria. Other disorders related to MetS could help assess the comprehensive risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study aimed to update the prevalence rates of MetS and to assess its relationship with other disorders and clinical conditions other than the criteria defining MetS. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted with a random population-based sample of 6588 study subjects between 18 and 102 years of age. Crude and sex- and age-adjusted prevalence rates of MetS were calculated, and their associations with comorbidities and clinical conditions other than their defining criteria were assessed by bivariate and multivariate analysis. <b>Results</b>: The adjusted prevalence rates were 36.0% for MetS (39.8% in men; 33.5% in women), 21.5% for premorbid Mets, and 14.5% for morbid MetS. Considering only clinical conditions other than the criteria defining MetS, the independent disorders associated with premorbid MetS were hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, high levels of lipid accumulation product, high triglyceride-glucose index (TyG), high visceral adiposity index, high fatty liver index, and high waist-to-height ratio (WtHR), highlighting excess adiposity (EA). The independent disorders associated with morbid MetS were hypercholesterolaemia, high-WtHR, EA, high-TyG index, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, CKD, and albuminuria, highlighting hypertension. <b>Conclusions</b>: One-fifth of the adult population has premorbid MetS, and almost one-sixth has morbid MetS. Almost two-fifths of people with MetS are at moderate, high, or very high risk of CKD, and four-fifths are at high or very high cardiovascular risk. In addition to the criteria defining MetS, other cardiovascular-renal-metabolic disorders show an independent association with MetS, highlighting EA for premorbid MetS and hypertension for morbid MetS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13030590
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Metabolic Syndrome to Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome in the SIMETAP Study: Prevalence Rates of Metabolic Syndrome and Its Independent Associations with Cardio-Renal-Metabolic Disorders Other than Its Defining Criteria

Sergio Cinza‐Sanjurjo, Ezequiel Arranz-Martínez, Vicente Pallarés‐Carratalá, A Serrano-Cumplido et al.
2 citations
Biomedicines
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
2.59
article

From Metabolic Syndrome to Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome in the SIMETAP Study: Prevalence Rates of Metabolic Syndrome and Its Independent Associations with Cardio-Renal-Metabolic Disorders Other than Its Defining Criteria

Sergio Cinza‐Sanjurjo, Ezequiel Arranz-Martínez, Vicente Pallarés‐Carratalá, A Serrano-Cumplido, Antonio Ruiz‐García, José Polo García, Carlos Escobar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a highly prevalent entity defined according to cardiometabolic criteria. Other disorders related to MetS could help assess the comprehensive risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study aimed to update the prevalence rates of MetS and to assess its relationship with other disorders and clinical conditions other than the criteria defining MetS. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted with a random population-based sample of 6588 study subjects between 18 and 102 years of age. Crude and sex- and age-adjusted prevalence rates of MetS were calculated, and their associations with comorbidities and clinical conditions other than their defining criteria were assessed by bivariate and multivariate analysis. <b>Results</b>: The adjusted prevalence rates were 36.0% for MetS (39.8% in men; 33.5% in women), 21.5% for premorbid Mets, and 14.5% for morbid MetS. Considering only clinical conditions other than the criteria defining MetS, the independent disorders associated with premorbid MetS were hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, high levels of lipid accumulation product, high triglyceride-glucose index (TyG), high visceral adiposity index, high fatty liver index, and high waist-to-height ratio (WtHR), highlighting excess adiposity (EA). The independent disorders associated with morbid MetS were hypercholesterolaemia, high-WtHR, EA, high-TyG index, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, CKD, and albuminuria, highlighting hypertension. <b>Conclusions</b>: One-fifth of the adult population has premorbid MetS, and almost one-sixth has morbid MetS. Almost two-fifths of people with MetS are at moderate, high, or very high risk of CKD, and four-fifths are at high or very high cardiovascular risk. In addition to the criteria defining MetS, other cardiovascular-renal-metabolic disorders show an independent association with MetS, highlighting EA for premorbid MetS and hypertension for morbid MetS.

BiomedicinesVol. 13(3)
Universitat Jaume I (ES), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES), Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES), Madrid Health Service (ES), Complejo Hospitalario de Cáceres (ES), Universidad Europea de Madrid (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
2.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.