Vocabulary learning strategies among Saudi EFL learners: a proficiency-level comparison using think-aloud protocols

This study aimed to investigate the differences in the vocabulary learning strategies (VLSs) employed by beginner and advanced Saudi learners of English as a foreign language (EFL). The research involved 60 participants who were equally divided between beginner and advanced proficiency levels. The data were collected using a demographic and background questionnaire, think-aloud protocols (TAPs) for real-time assessment of cognitive processes during vocabulary learning tasks, and semi-structured interviews for validation and deeper exploration of the TAP data. The findings revealed that the beginner learners predominantly relied on basic memory and cognitive strategies, such as repetition, rote memorization, and the use of bilingual dictionaries, which facilitated immediate results and foundational vocabulary building. In contrast, the advanced learners employed more complex strategies, including the use of monolingual dictionaries, contextual guessing, and morphological analysis, which promoted a deeper understanding and retention of new vocabulary words. Several factors that influenced VLS selection were identified: the beginners prioritized familiarity, lower cognitive load, and the need for tangible outcomes, whereas the advanced learners sought strategies that provided cognitive challenges and deeper comprehension. The study underscores the need for tailored pedagogical approaches to address the distinct strategy needs and preferences of EFL learners at different proficiency levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Education
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2025.2472480
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vocabulary learning strategies among Saudi EFL learners: a proficiency-level comparison using think-aloud protocols

Nouf Aljasir
2 citations
Cogent Education
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
6.89
article

Vocabulary learning strategies among Saudi EFL learners: a proficiency-level comparison using think-aloud protocols

Nouf Aljasir
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the differences in the vocabulary learning strategies (VLSs) employed by beginner and advanced Saudi learners of English as a foreign language (EFL). The research involved 60 participants who were equally divided between beginner and advanced proficiency levels. The data were collected using a demographic and background questionnaire, think-aloud protocols (TAPs) for real-time assessment of cognitive processes during vocabulary learning tasks, and semi-structured interviews for validation and deeper exploration of the TAP data. The findings revealed that the beginner learners predominantly relied on basic memory and cognitive strategies, such as repetition, rote memorization, and the use of bilingual dictionaries, which facilitated immediate results and foundational vocabulary building. In contrast, the advanced learners employed more complex strategies, including the use of monolingual dictionaries, contextual guessing, and morphological analysis, which promoted a deeper understanding and retention of new vocabulary words. Several factors that influenced VLS selection were identified: the beginners prioritized familiarity, lower cognitive load, and the need for tangible outcomes, whereas the advanced learners sought strategies that provided cognitive challenges and deeper comprehension. The study underscores the need for tailored pedagogical approaches to address the distinct strategy needs and preferences of EFL learners at different proficiency levels.

Cogent EducationVol. 12(1)
King Abdulaziz University (SA), Age Institute (FI)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
6.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.