Comparative evaluation of caudal epidural, interlaminar, and transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis

Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common degenerative spinal condition which is a major cause of pain and functional disability. Epidural steroid injections with or without local anesthetics have been used for the treatment of spinal pain, particularly for radicular symptoms and spinal stenosis. Aims and Objectives: The primary objective was to compare the efficacy of the three routes in terms of improvement in pain, disability and patient satisfaction. Secondary objectives were to compare the requirement for repeat injections and side effects, if any. Materials and Methods: In this prospective, randomized study, 90 patients with medical evaluation and pain pattern consistent with a diagnosis of LSS were randomized into three groups: Group-I (n=30) patients were administered caudal epidural steroid injection; Group-II (n=30) interlaminar epidural steroid injection; and Group-III (n=30) transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI). The primary objective was to compare the efficacy of the three routes in terms of improvement in pain, disability, and patient satisfaction. Secondary objectives were to compare the requirement for repeat injections and side effects, if any. Results: There was a statistically significant improvement in pain score, Oswestry disability index (ODI) score, and Swiss spinal stenosis questionnaire (SSSQ) score in all groups at all study periods. (P<0.01) The pain scores and SSSQ scores were clinically and statistically significantly lower after TFESI as compared to other groups from 1 month onward after the injection at all study interval periods (P<0.01), whereas ODI scores were better from 3 months onward. Conclusion: All three techniques provide good pain relief and improvement in disability to the patients. TFESI is better than other two techniques in terms of improvement in pain score, treatment outcome, and functional disability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71152/ajms.v16i3.4320
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of caudal epidural, interlaminar, and transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis

Amit Kumar, Jyotsna Jyotsna, Anshul Kumar, Navya Malhotra et al.
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Comparative evaluation of caudal epidural, interlaminar, and transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis

Amit Kumar, Jyotsna Jyotsna, Anshul Kumar, Navya Malhotra, Naveen Malhotra, Ravi Shankar Gupta
article en

Abstract

Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common degenerative spinal condition which is a major cause of pain and functional disability. Epidural steroid injections with or without local anesthetics have been used for the treatment of spinal pain, particularly for radicular symptoms and spinal stenosis. Aims and Objectives: The primary objective was to compare the efficacy of the three routes in terms of improvement in pain, disability and patient satisfaction. Secondary objectives were to compare the requirement for repeat injections and side effects, if any. Materials and Methods: In this prospective, randomized study, 90 patients with medical evaluation and pain pattern consistent with a diagnosis of LSS were randomized into three groups: Group-I (n=30) patients were administered caudal epidural steroid injection; Group-II (n=30) interlaminar epidural steroid injection; and Group-III (n=30) transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI). The primary objective was to compare the efficacy of the three routes in terms of improvement in pain, disability, and patient satisfaction. Secondary objectives were to compare the requirement for repeat injections and side effects, if any. Results: There was a statistically significant improvement in pain score, Oswestry disability index (ODI) score, and Swiss spinal stenosis questionnaire (SSSQ) score in all groups at all study periods. (P<0.01) The pain scores and SSSQ scores were clinically and statistically significantly lower after TFESI as compared to other groups from 1 month onward after the injection at all study interval periods (P<0.01), whereas ODI scores were better from 3 months onward. Conclusion: All three techniques provide good pain relief and improvement in disability to the patients. TFESI is better than other two techniques in terms of improvement in pain score, treatment outcome, and functional disability.

Asian Journal of Medical SciencesVol. 16(3)
Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Jamia Hamdard (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.