Is Pain Stronger in Adults or in Adolescents During Semi-Rapid Maxillary Expansion (SRME) and Fixed Appliance (FA) Therapies?

Rapid or semi-rapid maxillary expansion is a well-established method of treating severe transversal maxillary deficiency or transversal dental arch discrepancy. Pain is considered an inevitable undesirable adverse effect of orthodontic treatment. The aim of the present study was to compare pain levels experienced from the semi-RME (SRME) procedure between adults and adolescents and the lower fixed appliance (FA) procedure in the same patients. The study comprised 95 patients (51 adults and 44 adolescents) treated with a bonded acrylic Hass-type expander and the following month (after blocking the screw) with a lower fixed orthodontic appliance. Pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale from 0 to 10. During screw activation, adolescent patients reported a statistically significantly higher median pain level (5.00) compared to adults (3.00) [p = 0.009]. During the fixed appliance treatment, adolescent patients reported similar pain level to adults (4.5 and 4.0, respectively; p = 0.49). Interestingly, the median pain level for SRME in the whole group was 4, and was not different from the fixed appliance treatment sensations. Adolescent females had the highest pain sensation, while adult males had the lowest during both procedures, SRME and FA. The difference between the midpalatal suture opening (appearance of diastema) in adolescents (81.82%) vs. adults (64.71%) was not statistically significant (p = 0.062). The oldest patients with diastema were a 36y-2mo-old man and a 42-year-old woman, whereas the youngest patients without diastema were an 11y-11mo-old girl and a 13y-2mo-old boy. Moreover, all female patients between 30 to 42 years of age (eight women) had presented with diastema. In both age groups, the biggest disadvantage during SRME, reported by 50.53% of all patients (45.45% of adolescents and 54.9% of adults; p = 0.062), were speech problems, whereas only 18.95% of the total group (27.27% of adolescents vs. 11.76% of adults; p = 0.054) considered pain as the main disadvantage. During FA therapy, 32.63% of all patients reported pressure sores as the main disadvantage (29.55% of adolescents and 35.29% of adults; p = 0.551).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15052622
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Pain Stronger in Adults or in Adolescents During Semi-Rapid Maxillary Expansion (SRME) and Fixed Appliance (FA) Therapies?

Joanna Janiszewska‐Olszowska, Małgorzata Kuc-Michalska, Magdalena Pokucińska
1 citations
Applied Sciences
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
3.49
article

Is Pain Stronger in Adults or in Adolescents During Semi-Rapid Maxillary Expansion (SRME) and Fixed Appliance (FA) Therapies?

Joanna Janiszewska‐Olszowska, Małgorzata Kuc-Michalska, Magdalena Pokucińska
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Rapid or semi-rapid maxillary expansion is a well-established method of treating severe transversal maxillary deficiency or transversal dental arch discrepancy. Pain is considered an inevitable undesirable adverse effect of orthodontic treatment. The aim of the present study was to compare pain levels experienced from the semi-RME (SRME) procedure between adults and adolescents and the lower fixed appliance (FA) procedure in the same patients. The study comprised 95 patients (51 adults and 44 adolescents) treated with a bonded acrylic Hass-type expander and the following month (after blocking the screw) with a lower fixed orthodontic appliance. Pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale from 0 to 10. During screw activation, adolescent patients reported a statistically significantly higher median pain level (5.00) compared to adults (3.00) [p = 0.009]. During the fixed appliance treatment, adolescent patients reported similar pain level to adults (4.5 and 4.0, respectively; p = 0.49). Interestingly, the median pain level for SRME in the whole group was 4, and was not different from the fixed appliance treatment sensations. Adolescent females had the highest pain sensation, while adult males had the lowest during both procedures, SRME and FA. The difference between the midpalatal suture opening (appearance of diastema) in adolescents (81.82%) vs. adults (64.71%) was not statistically significant (p = 0.062). The oldest patients with diastema were a 36y-2mo-old man and a 42-year-old woman, whereas the youngest patients without diastema were an 11y-11mo-old girl and a 13y-2mo-old boy. Moreover, all female patients between 30 to 42 years of age (eight women) had presented with diastema. In both age groups, the biggest disadvantage during SRME, reported by 50.53% of all patients (45.45% of adolescents and 54.9% of adults; p = 0.062), were speech problems, whereas only 18.95% of the total group (27.27% of adolescents vs. 11.76% of adults; p = 0.054) considered pain as the main disadvantage. During FA therapy, 32.63% of all patients reported pressure sores as the main disadvantage (29.55% of adolescents and 35.29% of adults; p = 0.551).

Applied SciencesVol. 15(5)
Kardio-Med Silesia (PL), Pomeranian Medical University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.