The fundamentalist consensuses mentioned by Al-Zarkashi in His book, Al-Bahr Al-Muhit, Issues: Objections to analogy (division, difference, corruption of the situation, prohibition)

This research dealt with the fundamentalist consensus mentioned by Al-Zarkashi in his book Al-Bahr Al-Muheet, issues: the objections to analogy (division, difference, corruption of   status, prohibition) as a model, and an explanation of the importance of this book; Because it is one of the most compiled compilations of issues of consensus, then introducing Al-Zarkashi, his book, and unanimously, so I mentioned the issues that Al-Zarkashi told about the majority of fundamentalists in the objections to analogy, then studied them in a comparative fundamentalist study, with a statement of the intent of each text, editing the issue and mentioning the sayings of scholars in it, whether they were Mentioning the consensus or supporters, and standing on what issues were unanimous, and what was not, then standing on the validity of Al-Zarkashi's transmission of the consensus.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Anbar university Journal for Islamic Sciences
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34278/aujis.2025.186352
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The fundamentalist consensuses mentioned by Al-Zarkashi in His book, Al-Bahr Al-Muhit, Issues: Objections to analogy (division, difference, corruption of the situation, prohibition)

Talal mohammed Hamad -, Prof. Dr. Hamid Atwan Saleh -
Anbar university Journal for Islamic Sciences
Islamic Studies and History
article

The fundamentalist consensuses mentioned by Al-Zarkashi in His book, Al-Bahr Al-Muhit, Issues: Objections to analogy (division, difference, corruption of the situation, prohibition)

Talal mohammed Hamad -, Prof. Dr. Hamid Atwan Saleh -
article en

Abstract

This research dealt with the fundamentalist consensus mentioned by Al-Zarkashi in his book Al-Bahr Al-Muheet, issues: the objections to analogy (division, difference, corruption of   status, prohibition) as a model, and an explanation of the importance of this book; Because it is one of the most compiled compilations of issues of consensus, then introducing Al-Zarkashi, his book, and unanimously, so I mentioned the issues that Al-Zarkashi told about the majority of fundamentalists in the objections to analogy, then studied them in a comparative fundamentalist study, with a statement of the intent of each text, editing the issue and mentioning the sayings of scholars in it, whether they were Mentioning the consensus or supporters, and standing on what issues were unanimous, and what was not, then standing on the validity of Al-Zarkashi's transmission of the consensus.

Anbar university Journal for Islamic SciencesVol. 16(1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The fundamentalist consensuses mentioned by Al-Zarkashi in His book, Al-Bahr Al-Muhit, Issues: Objections to analogy (division, difference, corruption of the situation, prohibition) — Talal mohammed Hamad -, Prof. Dr. Hamid Atwan Saleh - · Anbar university Journal for Islamic Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS