Intensity and dimensionality-dependent dynamics of laser-proton acceleration in 1D, 2D, and 3D particle-in-cell simulations

Due to the high computational cost of 3D particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations, lower dimensional (2D or 1D) simulations are frequently used in their place. Our work shows that when modeling high-intensity laser ion acceleration, simulation dimensionality interfaces with laser intensity in the dynamics of ion acceleration at every step of the process, from laser absorption through particle acceleration. We expand on previous studies by comparing the behavior of 1D and 2D simulations (of different polarization) with 3D PIC simulations at high resolutions across five orders of magnitude of laser intensity, enabling us to study multiple regimes of laser-proton acceleration. We find that key output metrics such as maximum proton energy depend on a complex interplay of both simulation dimensionality and laser intensity regime. Differences between simulation predictions generally increase for higher laser intensity regimes, making 3D simulations especially important for quantitative predictions of next-generation laser experiments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Plasmas
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0234889
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intensity and dimensionality-dependent dynamics of laser-proton acceleration in 1D, 2D, and 3D particle-in-cell simulations

Joseph R. Smith, Scott Feister, Lillian A. Daneshmand, Madeline Aszalos
1 citations
Physics of Plasmas
Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
1.87
article

Intensity and dimensionality-dependent dynamics of laser-proton acceleration in 1D, 2D, and 3D particle-in-cell simulations

Joseph R. Smith, Scott Feister, Lillian A. Daneshmand, Madeline Aszalos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Due to the high computational cost of 3D particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations, lower dimensional (2D or 1D) simulations are frequently used in their place. Our work shows that when modeling high-intensity laser ion acceleration, simulation dimensionality interfaces with laser intensity in the dynamics of ion acceleration at every step of the process, from laser absorption through particle acceleration. We expand on previous studies by comparing the behavior of 1D and 2D simulations (of different polarization) with 3D PIC simulations at high resolutions across five orders of magnitude of laser intensity, enabling us to study multiple regimes of laser-proton acceleration. We find that key output metrics such as maximum proton energy depend on a complex interplay of both simulation dimensionality and laser intensity regime. Differences between simulation predictions generally increase for higher laser intensity regimes, making 3D simulations especially important for quantitative predictions of next-generation laser experiments.

Physics of PlasmasVol. 32(2)
University of Iowa (US), California State University, Channel Islands (US), Marietta College (US)
Ohio Space Grant Consortium, Ohio Supercomputer Center, National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Intensity and dimensionality-dependent dynamics of laser-proton acceleration in 1D, 2D, and 3D particle-in-cell simulations — Joseph R. Smith, Scott Feister, et al. · Physics of Plasmas (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS