Assessing Image Quality in Multiplexed Sensitivity-Encoding Diffusion-Weighted Imaging with Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction in Bladder MRI

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> This study compared the image quality of conventional multiplexed sensitivity-encoding diffusion-weighted imaging (MUSE-DWI) and deep learning MUSE-DWI with that of vendor-specific deep learning (DL) reconstruction applied to bladder MRI. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study included 57 patients with a visible bladder mass. DWI images were reconstructed using a vendor-provided DL algorithm (AIR<sup>TM</sup> Recon DL; GE Healthcare)-a CNN-based algorithm that reduces noise and enhances image quality-applied here as a prototype for MUSE-DWI. Two radiologists independently assessed qualitative features using a 4-point scale. For the quantitative analysis, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal intensity ratio (SIR), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the bladder lesions were recorded by two radiologists. The weighted kappa test and intraclass correlation were used to evaluate the interobserver agreement in the qualitative and quantitative analyses, respectively. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the image quality of the two sequences. <b>Results:</b> DL MUSE-DWI demonstrated significantly improved qualitative image quality, with superior sharpness and lesion conspicuity. There were no significant differences in the distortion or artifacts. The qualitative analysis of the images by the two radiologists was in good to excellent agreement (κ ≥ 0.61). Quantitative analysis revealed higher SNR, CNR, and SIR in DL MUSE-DWI than in MUSE-DWI. The ADC values were significantly higher in DL MUSE-DWI. Interobserver agreement was poor (ICC ≤ 0.32) for SNR and CNR and excellent (ICC ≥ 0.85) for SIR and ADC values in both DL MUSE-DWI and MUSE-DWI. <b>Conclusions:</b> DL MUSE-DWI significantly enhanced the image quality in terms of lesion sharpness, conspicuity, SNR, CNR, and SIR, making it a promising tool for clinical imaging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15050595
Primary Topic
MRI in cancer diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Image Quality in Multiplexed Sensitivity-Encoding Diffusion-Weighted Imaging with Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction in Bladder MRI

Seung Ha, Arnaud Guidon, Patricia Lan, Beom Jin Park et al.
Diagnostics
MRI in cancer diagnosis
article

Assessing Image Quality in Multiplexed Sensitivity-Encoding Diffusion-Weighted Imaging with Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction in Bladder MRI

Seung Ha, Arnaud Guidon, Patricia Lan, Beom Jin Park, Deuk Jae Sung, Na Han, Ki Choon Sim, Seulki Yoo, Yeo Eun Han, Min Ju Kim
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> This study compared the image quality of conventional multiplexed sensitivity-encoding diffusion-weighted imaging (MUSE-DWI) and deep learning MUSE-DWI with that of vendor-specific deep learning (DL) reconstruction applied to bladder MRI. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study included 57 patients with a visible bladder mass. DWI images were reconstructed using a vendor-provided DL algorithm (AIR<sup>TM</sup> Recon DL; GE Healthcare)-a CNN-based algorithm that reduces noise and enhances image quality-applied here as a prototype for MUSE-DWI. Two radiologists independently assessed qualitative features using a 4-point scale. For the quantitative analysis, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal intensity ratio (SIR), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the bladder lesions were recorded by two radiologists. The weighted kappa test and intraclass correlation were used to evaluate the interobserver agreement in the qualitative and quantitative analyses, respectively. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the image quality of the two sequences. <b>Results:</b> DL MUSE-DWI demonstrated significantly improved qualitative image quality, with superior sharpness and lesion conspicuity. There were no significant differences in the distortion or artifacts. The qualitative analysis of the images by the two radiologists was in good to excellent agreement (κ ≥ 0.61). Quantitative analysis revealed higher SNR, CNR, and SIR in DL MUSE-DWI than in MUSE-DWI. The ADC values were significantly higher in DL MUSE-DWI. Interobserver agreement was poor (ICC ≤ 0.32) for SNR and CNR and excellent (ICC ≥ 0.85) for SIR and ADC values in both DL MUSE-DWI and MUSE-DWI. <b>Conclusions:</b> DL MUSE-DWI significantly enhanced the image quality in terms of lesion sharpness, conspicuity, SNR, CNR, and SIR, making it a promising tool for clinical imaging.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(5)
General Electric (Spain) (ES), Korea University (KR), Clinical Solutions (US)
Korea Health Industry Development Institute, National Research Foundation of Korea
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
MRI in cancer diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.