Analyzing AI regulation through literature and current trends

Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has been rapidly evolving, necessitating that discussions on the need and design of regulatory frameworks be taken seriously. This paper reviews literature regarding AI regulations on a theoretical versus a practical level. It examines the different models of regulation – some of which are risk-based regulation and others are complete prohibition – to gauge the literature’s predictions on the scope, precise features, and direction of AI regulation. With particular reference to the EU AI Act as the primary case study, the paper analyzes the consequences of rules on innovation and the international standards’ impact on AI regulatory measures. The results show that almost all scholarly assumptions are accurate, showing how the issues are integrated at the practical level and where is it still challenging to comply and enforce. This paper advocates for continuous improvement in AI regulatory frameworks and more international interactions to ensure efficient governance for AI technologies. It contributes to ongoing debates about creating future-proof adaptable robust AI regulations which can negotiate the complexity between technological development and social protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100508
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing AI regulation through literature and current trends

Dasharathraj K Shetty, Phani Kumar Pullela, D. Cenitta, Shreepathy Ranga Bhatta B. et al.
7 citations
Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
16.56
article

Analyzing AI regulation through literature and current trends

Dasharathraj K Shetty, Phani Kumar Pullela, D. Cenitta, Shreepathy Ranga Bhatta B., Krishnamoorthi Makkithaya, Pranav Bhat, R. Vijaya Arjunan, Staissy Salu, Nikhil Venkatraman Hegde, T.R. Aishwarya
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has been rapidly evolving, necessitating that discussions on the need and design of regulatory frameworks be taken seriously. This paper reviews literature regarding AI regulations on a theoretical versus a practical level. It examines the different models of regulation – some of which are risk-based regulation and others are complete prohibition – to gauge the literature’s predictions on the scope, precise features, and direction of AI regulation. With particular reference to the EU AI Act as the primary case study, the paper analyzes the consequences of rules on innovation and the international standards’ impact on AI regulatory measures. The results show that almost all scholarly assumptions are accurate, showing how the issues are integrated at the practical level and where is it still challenging to comply and enforce. This paper advocates for continuous improvement in AI regulatory frameworks and more international interactions to ensure efficient governance for AI technologies. It contributes to ongoing debates about creating future-proof adaptable robust AI regulations which can negotiate the complexity between technological development and social protection.

Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and ComplexityVol. 11(1)
Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN), University of Mysore (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
16.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.