Emissions with Various Water Wash Configurations during Pilot Plant Testing of Aqueous Piperazine for CO<sub>2</sub> Capture

Five wash configurations were tested for 800 hours at a pilot plant campaign at the National Carbon Capture Center (NCCC): (1) a single-stage water wash (WWC), (2) a trickle bed alone, (3) the WWC + trickle bed, (4) the WWC + a third bed with structured packing (Bed 3 + WW), and (5) the WWC converted to an acid wash + the third bed (AW + Bed 3). Gas-phase analysis by PTR-ToF-MS (proton transfer reaction–time-of-flight–mass spectrometry) quantified outlet emissions of more than 38 species including ammonia, piperazine (PZ), 1-methylpiperazine (MPZ), acetaldehyde, and formaldehyde. The acid wash reduced ammonia to less than 10 ppb. Two-stage wash configurations reduced PZ and other amines to less than 0.1 ppb. The total listed hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) including aldehydes were not effectively removed by any of the wash configurations but were less than 10 tons/year when scaled to a 460 MW facility. All non-PZ emissions, including HAPs, were significantly reduced by thermal reclaiming of the solvent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c03763
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emissions with Various Water Wash Configurations during Pilot Plant Testing of Aqueous Piperazine for CO2 Capture

Gary T. Rochelle, Tomáš Mikoviny, Armin Wisthaler, Benjamin Drewry et al.
4 citations
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
2.85
article

Emissions with Various Water Wash Configurations during Pilot Plant Testing of Aqueous Piperazine for CO2 Capture

Gary T. Rochelle, Tomáš Mikoviny, Armin Wisthaler, Benjamin Drewry, K.L. Erickson, Carl M. Stevens
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Five wash configurations were tested for 800 hours at a pilot plant campaign at the National Carbon Capture Center (NCCC): (1) a single-stage water wash (WWC), (2) a trickle bed alone, (3) the WWC + trickle bed, (4) the WWC + a third bed with structured packing (Bed 3 + WW), and (5) the WWC converted to an acid wash + the third bed (AW + Bed 3). Gas-phase analysis by PTR-ToF-MS (proton transfer reaction–time-of-flight–mass spectrometry) quantified outlet emissions of more than 38 species including ammonia, piperazine (PZ), 1-methylpiperazine (MPZ), acetaldehyde, and formaldehyde. The acid wash reduced ammonia to less than 10 ppb. Two-stage wash configurations reduced PZ and other amines to less than 0.1 ppb. The total listed hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) including aldehydes were not effectively removed by any of the wash configurations but were less than 10 tons/year when scaled to a 460 MW facility. All non-PZ emissions, including HAPs, were significantly reduced by thermal reclaiming of the solvent.

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchVol. 64(10)
University of Oslo (NO), Honeywell (United States) (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, University of Texas at Austin, ExxonMobil Foundation
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
2.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.