Reorienting urban stream management to focus on equitable delivery of benefits

Urban streams are often managed in ways that contribute to societal inequities. Members of marginalized groups are frequently exposed to elevated flood risk and impaired water quality, with reduced access to essential water infrastructure and greenspace within stream corridors. The freshwater science research community has traditionally argued for stream management that improves ecological integrity, which can have the unintended consequence of steering investments away from the most degraded streams, which are often in low-income neighborhoods. We argue that it is time to reorient municipal stream management programs towards the objective of equitable delivery of benefits, which can take many forms, and to de-emphasize the goal of restoring streams to the pre-development ecological condition. To meet the objective of equitable delivery of benefits, municipalities will need to establish systems of collaborative governance, in which community organizations are empowered to participate as equal partners in urban stream management decision-making. We recognize the many practical challenges municipalities face in making these transitions, which will vary by country and region. Here, we identify some opportunities and highlight case studies illustrating how some communities are taking steps toward more equitable urban stream management.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Water
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000308
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reorienting urban stream management to focus on equitable delivery of benefits

Aditi S. Bhaskar, Na’Taki Osborne Jelks, Brian L. Murphy, Britt Rogers et al.
2 citations
PLOS Water
Urban Transport and Accessibility
4.35
article

Reorienting urban stream management to focus on equitable delivery of benefits

Aditi S. Bhaskar, Na’Taki Osborne Jelks, Brian L. Murphy, Britt Rogers, Krista A. Capps, C. Rhett Jackson, Jen A. Middleton, Seth J. Wenger, Mateo Scoggins, Robert J. Hawley, Isabelle C. Barrett, Charles B. van Rees, María M. Castillo, Brian P. Bledsoe, M. W. Neale, Wade L. Hadwen, Rachel Scarlett, Shayenna Nolan, B. M. Margetts, Erika Diaz Pascacio
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Urban streams are often managed in ways that contribute to societal inequities. Members of marginalized groups are frequently exposed to elevated flood risk and impaired water quality, with reduced access to essential water infrastructure and greenspace within stream corridors. The freshwater science research community has traditionally argued for stream management that improves ecological integrity, which can have the unintended consequence of steering investments away from the most degraded streams, which are often in low-income neighborhoods. We argue that it is time to reorient municipal stream management programs towards the objective of equitable delivery of benefits, which can take many forms, and to de-emphasize the goal of restoring streams to the pre-development ecological condition. To meet the objective of equitable delivery of benefits, municipalities will need to establish systems of collaborative governance, in which community organizations are empowered to participate as equal partners in urban stream management decision-making. We recognize the many practical challenges municipalities face in making these transitions, which will vary by country and region. Here, we identify some opportunities and highlight case studies illustrating how some communities are taking steps toward more equitable urban stream management.

PLOS WaterVol. 4(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
4.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.