The Evolution of Medicare: Challenges, Responses, and Prospects

The Medicare program has provided a near-universal source of health care coverage for America's elderly since 1965. Over its 60-year history, the program has evolved to cover a greater share of the population and to pay for an increasing share of the nation's health care bills. As Medicare has grown, so too have its challenges. The traditional Medicare program has failed to keep pace with a rapidly changing health care sector and demographic shifts. Constrained by its own benefit design, Medicare has allowed privately contracted health plans (Medigap, Medicare Advantage) to provide much needed yet inadequate remedies to the program's shortcomings. After briefly recounting Medicare's origins, we discuss how the program's founding statutes have hindered its ability to respond to new and growing challenges along the dimensions of cost sharing, cost containment, and benefit design. We then propose a three-pronged approach to reforming Medicare's benefit structure. We argue that a simplified enrollment process, a single benefit that brings together the program's constituent parts (Part A, Part B, and Part D), and a new organizational structure for care delivery based on the program's experience with Accountable Care Organizations will together create a robust foundation that can sustain the Medicare program into the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-11830274
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Evolution of Medicare: Challenges, Responses, and Prospects

Richard G. Frank, Sherry Glied, Brendan Lui
3 citations
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law
Healthcare Policy and Management
9.39
article

The Evolution of Medicare: Challenges, Responses, and Prospects

Richard G. Frank, Sherry Glied, Brendan Lui
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The Medicare program has provided a near-universal source of health care coverage for America's elderly since 1965. Over its 60-year history, the program has evolved to cover a greater share of the population and to pay for an increasing share of the nation's health care bills. As Medicare has grown, so too have its challenges. The traditional Medicare program has failed to keep pace with a rapidly changing health care sector and demographic shifts. Constrained by its own benefit design, Medicare has allowed privately contracted health plans (Medigap, Medicare Advantage) to provide much needed yet inadequate remedies to the program's shortcomings. After briefly recounting Medicare's origins, we discuss how the program's founding statutes have hindered its ability to respond to new and growing challenges along the dimensions of cost sharing, cost containment, and benefit design. We then propose a three-pronged approach to reforming Medicare's benefit structure. We argue that a simplified enrollment process, a single benefit that brings together the program's constituent parts (Part A, Part B, and Part D), and a new organizational structure for care delivery based on the program's experience with Accountable Care Organizations will together create a robust foundation that can sustain the Medicare program into the future.

Journal of Health Politics Policy and LawVol. 50(4)
Brookings Institution (US), New York University (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Healthcare Policy and Management
9.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.