Evaluation of the primary stability of two types of dental implants through computational modeling of insertion process and pull-out test

In this study, the primary stability of two widely used imported dental implants in the Iranian market, referred to here as Implant A and Implant B, was investigated and compared. This comparison was conducted through simulations of each implant insertion process into the bone, followed by pull-out test simulations. Key parameters, such as maximum insertion torque, pull-out strength, implant-bone structure stiffness, and the work done by external stimuli, i.e., forces and torques, during the insertion process were calculated using finite element methods, for each brand. Both insertion and pull-out operations can cause damage within the bone tissue; therefore, this study considered plastic and damage properties, in addition to the elastic properties of the bone tissue. The results showed a good agreement with existing experimental results, as well as with some finite element studies appeared in the literature. It was found that the insertion torque, stiffness, and holding power for Implant A were 48%, $\mathbf{3 1 \%}$, and $\mathbf{2 9 \%}$ higher, respectively, than those of the Implant B. Additionally, it was found that the work required for implantation of Implant A is $41 \%$ lower than that of Implant B. Thus, it can be concluded that, as expected, a lower amount of insertion energy implies less damage production in the bone tissue, so will result in a greater primary stability of the dental implant in terms of pull-out strength and implant-bone structure stiffness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icbme64381.2024.10895197
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the primary stability of two types of dental implants through computational modeling of insertion process and pull-out test

Gholamreza Rouhi, Pedram Akhlaghi, Armin Shanzari
1 citations
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
0.49
article

Evaluation of the primary stability of two types of dental implants through computational modeling of insertion process and pull-out test

Gholamreza Rouhi, Pedram Akhlaghi, Armin Shanzari
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this study, the primary stability of two widely used imported dental implants in the Iranian market, referred to here as Implant A and Implant B, was investigated and compared. This comparison was conducted through simulations of each implant insertion process into the bone, followed by pull-out test simulations. Key parameters, such as maximum insertion torque, pull-out strength, implant-bone structure stiffness, and the work done by external stimuli, i.e., forces and torques, during the insertion process were calculated using finite element methods, for each brand. Both insertion and pull-out operations can cause damage within the bone tissue; therefore, this study considered plastic and damage properties, in addition to the elastic properties of the bone tissue. The results showed a good agreement with existing experimental results, as well as with some finite element studies appeared in the literature. It was found that the insertion torque, stiffness, and holding power for Implant A were 48%, $\mathbf{3 1 \%}$, and $\mathbf{2 9 \%}$ higher, respectively, than those of the Implant B. Additionally, it was found that the work required for implantation of Implant A is $41 \%$ lower than that of Implant B. Thus, it can be concluded that, as expected, a lower amount of insertion energy implies less damage production in the bone tissue, so will result in a greater primary stability of the dental implant in terms of pull-out strength and implant-bone structure stiffness.

Amirkabir University of Technology (IR)
Amirkabir University of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
0.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.