Impact of Different Embeddings on Text Classification

Text representation has consistently posed significant challenges in the field of natural language processing. Features such as frequency, position in the text, and co-occurrence of words are used extensively to design various text representation techniques. There are different techniques currently used for text representation. Some are the Bag of words, TF-IDF, Word2vec, GloVe, and FastText. Normally, frequency-based text representations, which convert each word to a single number, are paired with machine learning algorithms, while context-based word embeddings that convert each word to n-dimensional vectors are used with neural network classifiers. This paper examines both frequency and context-based word embeddings on multiple machine learning and neural network-based classifiers and compares the results. The experimental results conclude that Bag of words and TF-IDF (frequency-based) have higher accuracy with ML classifiers such as Logistic Regression and decision tree; Word2vec, GloVe, and Fast Text (context-based) have performed extremely well for neural network-based classifiers such as LSTM, DNN, and GRU.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icraset63057.2024.10895636
Primary Topic
Text and Document Classification Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Different Embeddings on Text Classification

Mr. Gaikwad Milind, Medarametla Charan, K. M. Anil Kumar, S Anusha et al.
Text and Document Classification Technologies
article

Impact of Different Embeddings on Text Classification

Mr. Gaikwad Milind, Medarametla Charan, K. M. Anil Kumar, S Anusha, H N Sharath
article en

Abstract

Text representation has consistently posed significant challenges in the field of natural language processing. Features such as frequency, position in the text, and co-occurrence of words are used extensively to design various text representation techniques. There are different techniques currently used for text representation. Some are the Bag of words, TF-IDF, Word2vec, GloVe, and FastText. Normally, frequency-based text representations, which convert each word to a single number, are paired with machine learning algorithms, while context-based word embeddings that convert each word to n-dimensional vectors are used with neural network classifiers. This paper examines both frequency and context-based word embeddings on multiple machine learning and neural network-based classifiers and compares the results. The experimental results conclude that Bag of words and TF-IDF (frequency-based) have higher accuracy with ML classifiers such as Logistic Regression and decision tree; Word2vec, GloVe, and Fast Text (context-based) have performed extremely well for neural network-based classifiers such as LSTM, DNN, and GRU.

JSS Science and Technology University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Text and Document Classification Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Impact of Different Embeddings on Text Classification — Mr. Gaikwad Milind, Medarametla Charan, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS