Evaluation Method for Inaccurate Energy Measurement Based on Multi Source Measurement Data

A method for evaluating energy metering inaccuracies based on multi-source measurement data is proposed to address the issues of multiple types of non-equilibrium, measurement anomalies, and high cost of labeled samples in multi-source measurement data. Firstly, the feature data of the samples is extracted based on the encoder combined with attention mechanism, and the spatial distribution of the features of the electricity metering samples is obtained through contrastive learning method. Then set a group similarity threshold and calculate the average sample feature data of the group category. Subsequently, a complementary distance metric function constructed using cosine distance and Euclidean distance was used to evaluate the similarity of small sample learning classification. Finally, the complementary distance metric function is used to calculate the distance between the features of the mean grouped category samples, and feedback is provided to fine tune the encoder, contrastive learning, and softmax function parameters to achieve region oriented extraction of mean grouped category features. The experiment shows that in the process of inaccurate evaluation of electric energy measurement, the accuracy of the method proposed in this paper is not less than 98%, achieving timely detection and resolution of abnormal measurement data, improving the quality and availability of multi-source measurement data, and providing high-quality data support for the fusion application of measurement data at the provincial level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ccpqt64497.2024.00047
Primary Topic
Engineering Applied Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation Method for Inaccurate Energy Measurement Based on Multi Source Measurement Data

Bin Xu, Jian Dou, Shuang Qie, Xuan Liu et al.
Engineering Applied Research
article

Evaluation Method for Inaccurate Energy Measurement Based on Multi Source Measurement Data

Bin Xu, Jian Dou, Shuang Qie, Xuan Liu, Xingqi Liu
article en

Abstract

A method for evaluating energy metering inaccuracies based on multi-source measurement data is proposed to address the issues of multiple types of non-equilibrium, measurement anomalies, and high cost of labeled samples in multi-source measurement data. Firstly, the feature data of the samples is extracted based on the encoder combined with attention mechanism, and the spatial distribution of the features of the electricity metering samples is obtained through contrastive learning method. Then set a group similarity threshold and calculate the average sample feature data of the group category. Subsequently, a complementary distance metric function constructed using cosine distance and Euclidean distance was used to evaluate the similarity of small sample learning classification. Finally, the complementary distance metric function is used to calculate the distance between the features of the mean grouped category samples, and feedback is provided to fine tune the encoder, contrastive learning, and softmax function parameters to achieve region oriented extraction of mean grouped category features. The experiment shows that in the process of inaccurate evaluation of electric energy measurement, the accuracy of the method proposed in this paper is not less than 98%, achieving timely detection and resolution of abnormal measurement data, improving the quality and availability of multi-source measurement data, and providing high-quality data support for the fusion application of measurement data at the provincial level.

North China Electric Power University (CN), China Electric Power Research Institute
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Engineering Applied Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.