Application of Deep Learning Models in Classification of Sagittal Gait Patterns Based on Rodda’s Classification System in Patients with Cerebral Palsy

Gait classification has been extensively employed in the context of cerebral palsy (CP) to facilitate clinical decision-making and to assess various treatment outcomes. However, relying solely on clinical judgment can introduce inconsistencies. This study assessed the performance of deep learning models, i.e., LSTM, GRU, and Attention-LSTM in automatic classification of the CP gait patterns, based on Rodda’s classification system, in order to enhance both objectivity and accuracy. Kinematic data from 317 CP patients (634 limbs for two trials) were recorded using a Vicon motion capture system, focusing on hip, knee, and ankle angles. The data were preprocessed, normalized, and then segregated into training, validation, and test sets. The deep learning models provided moderate classification performances, in a range of $\mathbf{6 2 \%}$ to 73%. The LSTM model delivered the highest accuracy ($\mathbf{7 3. 2 2 \%}$), followed by GRU ($\mathbf{7 0. 8 6 \%}$), and Attention-LSTM ($62.55 \%$). The higher performance of the LSTM model was attributed to its ability to retain long-term temporal information. It was concluded that the deep learning models are promising tools for automatic classification of the gait pattern of CP individuals and can be well employed as a decision support system to help inexperienced clinicians. However, for more accurate classification results, they need a larger dataset of the kinematics data of CP individuals and their gait trials, as well as an even sample distribution across $C P$ groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icbme64381.2024.10895682
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of Deep Learning Models in Classification of Sagittal Gait Patterns Based on Rodda’s Classification System in Patients with Cerebral Palsy

Ali Jamshidian, Farzam Farahmand, Alireza Taheri, Mahya Shojaeefard et al.
1 citations
Medical Imaging and Analysis
0.18
article

Application of Deep Learning Models in Classification of Sagittal Gait Patterns Based on Rodda’s Classification System in Patients with Cerebral Palsy

Ali Jamshidian, Farzam Farahmand, Alireza Taheri, Mahya Shojaeefard, Alireza Arjmand Mazidi, Mostafa Banihashemi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Gait classification has been extensively employed in the context of cerebral palsy (CP) to facilitate clinical decision-making and to assess various treatment outcomes. However, relying solely on clinical judgment can introduce inconsistencies. This study assessed the performance of deep learning models, i.e., LSTM, GRU, and Attention-LSTM in automatic classification of the CP gait patterns, based on Rodda’s classification system, in order to enhance both objectivity and accuracy. Kinematic data from 317 CP patients (634 limbs for two trials) were recorded using a Vicon motion capture system, focusing on hip, knee, and ankle angles. The data were preprocessed, normalized, and then segregated into training, validation, and test sets. The deep learning models provided moderate classification performances, in a range of $\mathbf{6 2 \%}$ to 73%. The LSTM model delivered the highest accuracy ($\mathbf{7 3. 2 2 \%}$), followed by GRU ($\mathbf{7 0. 8 6 \%}$), and Attention-LSTM ($62.55 \%$). The higher performance of the LSTM model was attributed to its ability to retain long-term temporal information. It was concluded that the deep learning models are promising tools for automatic classification of the gait pattern of CP individuals and can be well employed as a decision support system to help inexperienced clinicians. However, for more accurate classification results, they need a larger dataset of the kinematics data of CP individuals and their gait trials, as well as an even sample distribution across $C P$ groups.

Sharif University of Technology (IR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Medical Imaging and Analysis
0.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.